this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
14 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

774 readers
306 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.

Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.

Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Alphane_Moon
CSFFlame
[email protected]
14
AMD Fluid Motion Frames 2 lowers latency by 28% — low-latency frame generation comes to RX 6000 and RX 7000 GPUs (www.tomshardware.com)
submitted 4 months ago by Alphane_Moon to c/hardware
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

in the strict comparison between DLSS and FSR frame gen, (without their upscaling component), Channels that bench it like Ancient Gameplays prefers FSR FG. given that this is itterative over 1.0, it would be reletively safe to say that his opinion wouldnt change.

everyone agrees that the DLSS upscaling portion is better than FSR/XeSS which is what keeps DLSS and its features relevant.

no doubt hed benchmark it down the line