this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2024
428 points (74.6% liked)

US Authoritarianism

736 readers
735 users here now

Hello, I am researching American crimes against humanity. . This space so far has been most strongly for memes, and that's fine.

There's other groups and you are welcome to add to them. USAuthoritarianism Linktree

See Also, my website. USAuthoritarianism.com be advised at time of writing it is basically just a donate link

Cool People: [email protected]

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (11 children)

Read the damn book, it goes through its use by the major liberal thinkers since the 1700s. If you read any leftist or semi-serious literature on the subject, they'll be using that same definition.

If that's too much, just peruse https://www.google.com/search?q=site:marxists.org%20liberalism

Every work there is political and either historical or of some level of academic rigor.

[–] TheOtherThyme 1 points 2 months ago (10 children)

"Liberalism is a word that means different things to different people."

That is literally first damn sentence that come up for your under your link!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (9 children)

We've supplied you with works showing the definition that OP and every even semi-serious political philosopher, both liberal and communist means when they say it.

Why are you dying on this hill? Just educate yourself.

[–] TheOtherThyme 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Dude, I literally showed you the dictionary. You think that Wikipedia, the OED, and everyone else is wrong but one dead Italian communist was right. Yes, pinko maranara had half a point in that some bad things have been done in the past in the name of liberalism, but that can be said for every major political philosophy.

I find it very telling that not one of you russian trolls can tell me who you would support in the upcoming US election.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

You think that Wikipedia, the OED, and everyone else is wrong but one dead Italian communist was right.

There's 30 pages of citations, he goes through every major liberal philosopher and most of the leaders, if you want to say everyone from Locke to Smith to De Tocqueville and Washington to Jefferson to Teddy Roosevelt didn't understand their own philosophy, that's a hell of a take.

I find it very telling that not one of you russian trolls can tell me who you would support in the upcoming US election.

Do you genuinely believe that anyone you're talking to is a Russian troll? You can look at people's post histories.

[–] TheOtherThyme 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Answer the question. If you can or if you could, who would you vote for ?

[–] TheOtherThyme 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Here is the fun part of this hill. I'm not dying on it. No matter what direction thus little internet debate goes, at the end of the day, liberal still means liberal. You all insisting that up means down and liberal is bad because reasons doesn't change anything except amuse me. It's like watching monkeys flung poo. I'm not dieing on this hill, I got my feet up earing popcorn. Let me know when y'all get the dictionary updated.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] TheOtherThyme 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A vote for trump. A vote that looks at the only two possible outcomes of this election and see no difference between the two. Thank you, go fuck yourself.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I live in South Carolina, it's never going blue, but it could potentially result in federal funds for PSL.

[–] TheOtherThyme 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wiki has citations too. Why do you think that they are all wrong? I don't recall Smith ever agruing "Luberals bad therefore vote for fascism"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Read the damn book. The point of the book isn't "liberals bad". I am trying to give you a more nuanced view of what the freedom of liberalism means so you can understand what OP was talking about and you can meaningfully participate in these conversations instead of insisting that the every philosopher on all sides of the issue didn't understand what they are talking about.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)