Asklemmy

43913 readers

332 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

what if the rules change was never revoked in the hunger games (lemmy.ml)

submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

What impact would this have on the rebellion, and how would Snow mess with Katniss and Peeta?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

If they never did the whole 2 can win rule, you still get a powerful figurehead in Katniss, or Peeta if you think he'd actually kill her. The lack of blatant unfair behavior would hurt the resistance in recruitment though. The resistance might still succeed, but it would take even longer. The trauma of having to kill the other could also leave the survivor broken which would be bad for the resistance.

If they announced thev2 can live, but committed to taking it back, the double suicide would be a useful tool for the resistance. They wouldn't have Katniss as a weapon, but her martyrdom would be almost as powerful. The key here is that a successful resistance would just be a different dictator.