this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2024
328 points (98.5% liked)

Uplifting News

11284 readers
513 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's not their responsibility to educate you. Look that information up yourself if it's something you're interested in. You're just being negative without any reason. Reintroduction programs are working around the world.

[โ€“] [email protected] -3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I wasn't demanding they educate me, I was curious if they had a source to back up their claim.

The ones being negative are the zoos keeping animals captive for entertainment. The good of conservation and rehabilitation work doesn't justify that

Edit: I educated myself, turns out my hunch was right and the point I was trying to make stands. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7380022/ "The 40 species of animals bred for release by zoos represented only 14% of all animal species for which conservation translocations were published and only 25% of all animal species that were bred for releases occurring in North America"

We don't even need zoos to do the conservation work.

Here's a more general overview https://sentientmedia.org/pros-and-cons-of-zoos/

You're welcome for the education ๐Ÿ˜Š

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I wasn't demanding they educate me, I was curious if they had a source to back up their claim.

Yeah, we all know. You're "just asking questions".

You've also made it clear that you don't understand how modern zoos tend to work. They are often rehabilitation centers. And yes, we clearly do need them to do the conservation work because it's not being done otherwise.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Did you read the study I linked? Do you have a source for your claims? "Just asking questions" is very different to asking for a source, especially when I've looked into it and found a study counter to your claim. For the record, I also ask for sources from people who I think are correct or mostly correct: https://slrpnk.net/comment/10039992

Edit: more info on zoos https://faunalytics.org/does-zoo-accreditation-really-mean-happier-animals/