this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
1316 points (90.8% liked)

Memes

45901 readers
1459 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't tell me... tell your meat-obsessed friend over there.

[–] Gabu 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Right... let's check his comment point by point, shall we?

A person does not need to eat meat.

I believe you'll agree with this without the need to further explain it.

People absolutely do need to eat meat

This is strictly true, in our current context. The food production chain simply cannot cope with the abrupt loss of a main source of nutrients in most places. Particularly when 'muricans are throwing away up to half of their food.

specifically cooked meat in order to be intelligent.

Non-statement statement of dubious quality. Should be rewritten.

It’s what made cavemen smarter than other animals.

That's invariably the most accepted explanation to homo sapiens evolution

Also the recent rise in average height and IQ from good nutrition is in part directly related to cheap meat from factory farming.

Meat provides very dense nutritional value, I'm sure you'll agree - it's why carnivores exist to begin with. We know, factually, that nutritional quality directly correlates with better health, both in body and mind. We also know that meat can be VERY cheap, as long as you're not looking for "grade A elite baby wagyuu" stuff.

Where, exactly, is your point explicit?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s invariably the most accepted explanation to homo sapiens evolution

Oh really? Accepted by whom?

[–] Gabu 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The fucking scientific community? Let me be direct - Are you seriously going to ask ridiculous questions a 5 year old could answer instead of providing any argument whatsoever? Because at that point, I'd rather not waste my time with a functionally illiterate individual.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The fucking scientific community?

Then you should have zero problem providing proper back-up to your claims, shouldn't you?