this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2024
8 points (100.0% liked)

Oregon

438 readers
1 users here now

Welcome! Alternative to Oregon Reddit on Lemmy.

Here you can post anything about Oregon State.

Active stats from all instances

/c/[email protected]

Created on July 7th, 2023

Subscribers: 336

User Guide

https://join-lemmy.org/docs/introduction.html

c/Oregon Rules

1. Server Main Rules

The main rules of the server will be enforced stringently.

https://sh.itjust.works/

2. No brigading/ harassment/ usernames, etc.

All usernames and display names must be censored, unless it's a well known public figure.

Do not:

Encourage the brigading or trolling of other communities. Harass/mass ping. Use racist language. Post about getting banned on other communities.

3. No spam or reposts + limit off topic comments

Discussion is healthy.

However, spamming posts will be removed. Reposts will be removed with the exception of a repost becoming the main hub for discussion on that topic.

Off topic comments that do not pertain to the post at hand may be removed if it is deemed they contribute nothing and/or foster hostility at users. This mostly applies to political and religious debate, but can be applied to other things at the mod's discretion.

4. Post must have Oregon explicitly involved

Post must have Oregon explicitly involved in some capacity. This can be talking about oregon, a city in Oregon, laws, and ext.

5. Educate don’t attack

No mocking, demeaning, flamebaiting, purposeful antagonizing, trolling, hateful language, false accusation or allegation, or backseat moderating is allowed. Don’t resort to ad hominem attacks against another user or insult other people, examples of violations would be going after the person rather than the stance they take.

If we feel the comment is uncalled for we will remove it. Stay civil and there won't be problems.

6. No Advertising

Under no circumstance are you allowed to promote or advertise any product or service

8. No factually misleading information

Content that makes claims or implications that can be proven false or misleading will be removed.

8. No Editorialized Headlines

Please try and keep headlines similar to the source articles headlines.

9. No Political Ads or Posts

No political ads of any type are to be posted on r/oregon. Discussion is fine. This includes Oregonians' posts telling people who or what to vote for.

No "vote for" No “vote yes/no”


Other Communities

c/[email protected]

c/[email protected]

c/[email protected]

c/[email protected]

c/[email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Potentially big changes are coming to ODOT's funding model in the next few years. There are holes that the state can't patch.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Seems like VMT is the only sensible approach here. Gotta avoid Big Brother, though.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, it probably will be. Which, I think is a decent compromise- I've done it for commercial trucks and it's fine. However commercial vehicles file a quarterly odometer mileage report and pay per mile based on their vehicle weight and axle count. Then trucks paying by WMT get to buy PUC diesel at truck stops that has most of the road tax taken off.
This is in contrast to the consumer pilot program where drivers plug a computer into their car that tracks the ecu mileage. That tracking is something that is an absolute nonstarter for me- and also not even possible because I don't even drive cars with an OBDII port they could use lol.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

My motorbike certainly doesn't have OBD2.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Yup. So without a computer tracker, which theyll need to support somehow, they'll need to have a paper/self report filing system.

Motorbikes I'd more expect them to just add a flat registration fee and call it good. Motorbikes cause almost zero road maintenance damage.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The problem with tolls on specific highway sections, like the proposed one on 205 that got axed, is that they are both A. a regressive tax against the poor, precluding them from using that road for anything, and B. Likely to induce a lot of knock-on effects on traffic flow because people are generally cheap and will try to use surface streets to avoid tolls. Especially in an area that hasn't previously used tolling at all, so there isn't user precedent for accepting tolls.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Even with those concerns, I still like tolls

A. Driving a car has externalities that are currently not priced in the gas tax / registration fees. This means that having toll free roads are also regressive in that they are forcing people who do not drive (often due to poverty) to subsidize those who do drive. It makes sense to make the drivers pay for more of the harm they cause others, and tolls are a simple way of doing this. They are also can help discourage driving since paying every time you drive in a certain area is probably more noticable than paying once a year when you register your car.

B. This is a real issue in 205 where there is another bridge right next to it. Maybe in this case, you can add a toll to both bridges. But generally, the urban growth boundaries in Oregon make it easy to find places to find put toll booths where there is no way to drive around it.