this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
56 points (95.2% liked)
Danger Dust
272 readers
34 users here now
A community for those occupationally exposed to dusts, toxins, pollutants, hazardous materials or noxious environments
Dangerous Dusts , Fibres, Toxins, Pollutants, Occupational Hazards, Stonemasonry, Construction News and Environmental Issues
#Occupational Diseases
#Autoimmune Diseases
#Silicosis
#Cancer
#COPD
#Chronic Fatigue
#Hazardous Materials
#Kidney Disease
#Pneumoconiosis
#The Environment
#Pollutants
#Pesticides
and more
Please be nice to each other and follow the rules : []https://mastodon.world/about
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
To summarize:
The article discusses the recent actions of House Republicans, particularly through the House Appropriations Committee, which voted to block enforcement of a safety rule aimed at protecting coal miners from black lung disease. On July 10, the committee, led by Alabama Republican Rep. Robert B. Aderholt, made significant cuts to the Department of Labor's funding, slashing it by 23%. These cuts impact several areas, including the Wage and Hour Division and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, effectively reducing protections for vulnerable workers.
One critical aspect of the appropriations bill is Section 123, which prevents the enforcement of a new rule designed to lower miners' exposure to respirable crystalline silica, a major cause of black lung disease. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health has been advocating for reduced silica exposure limits since 1974, but the current political climate has hindered progress. The new rule, published in April 2024 by the Mine Safety and Health Administration, aimed to reduce silica exposure to 50 micrograms per cubic meter, potentially saving over a thousand lives and preventing thousands of illnesses.
The article criticizes Aderholt and his colleagues for betraying coal miners, highlighting the irony of their political rhetoric that claims to support blue-collar workers. The United Mine Workers and other advocates have condemned this decision, emphasizing the severe health risks it poses to miners. The article concludes with a call for Congress to reject this harmful provision and prioritize the well-being of mining families.