this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
108 points (97.4% liked)

Wikipedia

1660 readers
364 users here now

A place to share interesting articles from Wikipedia.

Rules:

Recommended:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.today/post/12851483

What's the craziest or funniest Wikipedia outline you've seen?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TrousersMcPants 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think the meme is just showing the ridiculous difference between the company being controversial for literal child labor and imperialist exploitation compared to simply making a female character "less sexy"

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This is the relativist argument I was talking about

Playing off one kind of oppression against another has never done any good to emancipatory endeavor (aka the left)

[–] TrousersMcPants 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Treating a controversy about a fictional character wearing different shoes with the same severity as literal child slavery sounds absolutely exhausting and absurd to me

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I don't know if you have noticed, but cartoon characters depicted as female are usually depicted as sexy. Almost always in pubs.

If you care about oppression, you will understand how the reduction to being sexy for men ("objectification") of women all over society is important. Imagine the violence of not being seen as a person by default, an agent, but an object to male desire, the male gaze.

Again and again, since the wake of feminism, men bring up that relativist argument. Oh you feel oppressed because over your whole lifetime and that of your mother and sisters men treat you like a peace of pretty meat? Well, wrong, honey, look at "literal real problems".

[–] TrousersMcPants 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Ok, but the controversy over the mnm character was them de-sexualizing the character. This should not be a controversy because this is a positive change. However it's treated as a controversy in the same level as child slavery in this wiki article. I think this is where we've gotten mixed up

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Ooh I see. Thats one solid mix-up. But I still think its good to take it seriously as a controversy, even though it shouldn't be as it's positive change. The backlash shows it's still a fight to be faught