Science

199 readers

1 users here now

Community for discussion about experiments or discoveries made with scientific methods.

Links to articles: please preserve headlines when possible, shortening / replacing as needed. When multiple articles are involved, please consider a text post.

If there is a narrower community available, discussion is encouraged there.

If a topic relates more closely to application of knowledge than obtaining it, discussion is encouraged in c/technology.

Attribution for the banner image: Image by FreePik

founded 11 months ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Just Stop Oil: do radical protests turn the public away from a cause? Here’s the evidence (theconversation.com)

submitted 5 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

41 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Thank you for sharing the supporting article. Sometimes, evidence contradicts intuition. From your link:

Less is known about the relative impacts of non-violent but disruptive tactics. “Is it better to throw soup on a painting, or block traffic, or glue yourself to something?” says Dana Fisher, a sociologist at American University in Washington DC. “We don’t know which is the most effective.”

But there is evidence that these types of protest can have an impact. Social Change Lab gathered opinions in three surveys — each asking around 2,000 people — before, during and after disruptive protests in the United Kingdom by Just Stop Oil and Extinction Rebellion in April 20228. The protesters blockaded oil depots and glued themselves to government buildings and oil-company offices. Most people who were surveyed opposed the actions, but continued to support climate policies and Just Stop Oil’s goals to stop new fossil-fuel projects. This counters the view that disruptive action can sour public opinion on an issue.

Overcoming bias is an essential part of science literacy in both acknowledging climate change as a phenomenon and policy change to prevent it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Yeah, disruptive can be completely acceptable. The problem is that it takes more than just disruptive to be effective — not just avoiding a negative impact, but having a positive one.