this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2024
17 points (90.5% liked)
Chevron 7
1340 readers
72 users here now
Chevron 7
A community for sharing humor about Stargate in all its iterations.
Rules:
- Follow the Lemmy.World Terms of Service. This includes (but is not limited to):
- Lemmy.World is not a place for you to attack other people or groups of people.
- Always be respectful of the privacy of others who access and use the website.
- Links to copyright infringing content are not allowed
- Stay on topic. Posts must be directly related to Stargate, be it a meme, joke, screenshot, discussion prompt, etc.
- Be good, don't be bad. You're an adult, or close enough, I trust you know how to act around people.
For more general Stargate content, visit [email protected]
founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
True, but the staff-cannon-things don't seem like a great alternative, given that they're usually fired from breast-hip height and seem to lack optics. And even if they did have optics, you'd think gliders and especially Al'kesh would already have engaged you.
Staff weapons against gliders, sure, but that just touches more on the cinema-cool element, where advanced aerospace-fighters are taken down by weapons that shouldn't hold a candle to that sort of platform. Another example is Shepard shooting down a wraith dart with an M249 (which he was carrying for whatever reason).
Stingers and AT-4's I can understand, but I feel like more realistically they'd be on the far edge of what could defend against gliders and darts.
I would assume that any air defence would be neutralized during the initial planetary bombardment after the attacking snake has dealt with any space based defence group.
The other option is anything cargo ship or higher have shields making ground based defence pointless.