this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2024
49 points (93.0% liked)
Games
16647 readers
1041 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Depends on if the publisher is scummy or not. BG3 and Elden Ring were $60.
Even then tho, this game was $60 back in 2010. Releasing for the same price 14 years later is insane, not even EA would pull that.
I mean, technically, it's cheaper now because of inflation, but that's more pedantic than even I care to be
but yeah, last few nintendo games have been $70 I think so there have been rumors that it's the new norm for the big N
Last few? I just browsed the front page of the Eshop and there was only one $70 Nintendo title.
I know totk was one, I guess I just assumed that a few more had come out at that price point
Eh, the inflation argument never moved me for a variety of reasons. But either way, if that’s true then the first part of my comment applies.
Yup with inflation the $60 would be somewhere between $80-85 dollars equivalent in buying power.
So its technically cheaper. $60 today is $40-45, 14 years ago.