this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2024
57 points (96.7% liked)
Top View
685 readers
1 users here now
A place to share pictures taken from above, that reveal interesting views, fascinating places or different angles to places.
I have made a short video describing how I take the pictures that I share, here
This is not a rule! You are welcome to share any aerial picture you feel is worth sharing. I just thought that maybe some of you may need a little help. It's really addictive once you get started!
TOP POST
(updated manually)
founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
For someone who knows nothing about electric generation, can someone ELI5 how this is different (good and bad) than solar panels?
I always felt solar panels are less efficient in large scale (archers vs panels on your house) but not enough to look into it.
I don't think this is what they are directly aiming for with this specific one, but this general idea of a large field of reflectors and a central receiver can be built to store heat for a while. That lets you use solar power overnight
This sort of solar power generally doesn't compete successfully with regular solar panels in cost, and obviously it can't just be set up on a bunch of random roofs like panels can. Still, it's potentially a very useful technology if someone does work out how to make it a bit cheaper or more efficient, and it still generates clean power in the process too
The link explains that this is experimental, and that they are both experimenting with turning water into steam, and then using the steam to generate electricity (I imagine this is kind of like steam engines right?), but they are also experimenting with splitting water, in order to make what they call sun-fuel (i expect this is just hydrogen?)
Yeah, exactly. That's also how coal, gas, and nuclear power plants work too. Turns out that running steam through a turbine is just a really good way to make power.
You actually can make other fuels with solar power too, and since they're listing it separately from water splitting I think they might be doing that. It is possible to make hydrocarbon fuels out of CO2 and water (or mlre accurately, carbon monoxide and hydrogen) with the right combination of catalysts and energy. It's an application of the Fischer–Tropsch process, which has traditionally just been used for converting coal or biomass into more useful forms. So if that's what they're doing, they're taking carbon out of the air and hydrogen out of water and then combining those two into petrol and such, using solar energy for each step of the process
Great! Thanks!
Photovoltaic solar panels turn light directly into electricity. This thing bounces light to a place where it can be turned into heat. The heat boils water, and the steam turns a turbine. The spinning motion is converted into electricity.
Steam power is a lot older than photovoltaic cells. Nearly every other form of power generation is basically just spinning a turbine. Nuclear, coal, and geothermal heat up steam. Hydro and wind get nature to spin the turbine. With steam power, all your problems with efficiency are mechanical. How do you reduce friction in the bearings? How do you get more power out of the steam? Whereas developing more efficient PV cells requires a deep understanding of subatomic physics. On the other hand, it's difficult to think your way out of physical limits on steam power, like where does the waste heat go? The future of PV probably still has surprises left for us.
Also it sounds like the energy can be stored and used even when there is no sun! Lastly, they also mention experiments with splitting water into fluel, so i expect this is just splitting water into hydrogen right?