this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
81 points (98.8% liked)

Spaceflight

609 readers
27 users here now

Your one-stop shop for spaceflight news and discussion.

All serious posts related to spaceflight are welcome! JAXA, ISRO, CNSA, Roscosmos, ULA, RocketLab, Firefly, Relativity, Blue Origin, etc. (Arca and Pythom, if you must).

Other related space communities:

Related meme community:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 43 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Officials originally planned to place pallets of the old batteries inside a series of Japanese supply freighters for controlled, destructive reentries over the ocean. But due to a series of delays, the final cargo pallet of old batteries missed its ride back to Earth, so NASA jettisoned the batteries to make an unguided reentry.

NASA incorrectly believed the batteries would completely burn up during the return through the atmosphere.

Pretty solid case from the home owner. Per the treaty, the agency responsible for the space objects is liable; NASA fucked up in assuming it would burn up but it didn’t. What if this had hit someone and killed them?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Those must have been some pretty impressive batteries to survive re-entry.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

It was a pretty solid chunk of inconel that went through the roof. It was probably some sort of mounting hardware for the batteries.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

inside a series of Japanese supply freighters

In case you went 'Space Freighters!?' like me, the JAXA's H-II Transfer Vehicle-9 is the last supply freighter in question.