this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
83 points (92.8% liked)

World News

32491 readers
710 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] coffeebiscuit -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The subsidies aren’t for the green transition, the subsidies are there to get more influence on the markets, and not just the car market. Outprice the competition…

And no I didn’t forget about “what about…”

Sadly both have a same goal. Both influence competition in a bad way.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Uh huh, then why aren't they subsidizing gas cars to the same extent?

Subsidizing electric cars is good and y'all need to stop making excuses.

[–] coffeebiscuit 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

They are subsidizing gas cars,… and fossil fuel production is also subsidized.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

And yet their gas cars are not being sanctioned. Doesn't that strike you as strange? What's the difference?

[–] coffeebiscuit 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

No, because those aren’t a threat to the (western) car marked. The electric ones are.

And the fact that China is currently controlling the battery resources. Also seems to be an influence.

But please buy one if you want one.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

So I'm not sure what you think my point was.

I'm not saying the US is attacking China for having a green transition. I know it's just to protect business interests.