this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
507 points (99.0% liked)

LGBTQ+

2703 readers
86 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Moldy Monday continues.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 68 points 5 months ago (29 children)

What part of this great picture got them scared?

[–] norimee 37 points 5 months ago (27 children)

I guess, because its very hard for biological women to get abs like that. The muscles are just different. Not impossible, but way, way harder then for men and therefore quite rare.

And we all know, its very scary for bigots to even look at trans people. They might have to wash their eyes with soap now.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

In future I'd advise using the term cis woman instead of biological woman because biological woman has a history of being used as a transphobic term by TERFs to delegitimise trans people, especially in the UK.

[–] norimee 2 points 5 months ago

Yeah, I wasn't sure about how to differentiate it. English is not my natural language.

I disagree about using "cis" in this context though. I wasn't sure how much of the effects are hormonal and if it is the same for trans men. And its also true for non binary and genderfluid persons. So cis seemed to exclude many.

I got curious and looked into it and there were some helpful comments too. It turns out it's mostly about the estrogen. So this means cis women, xx-chomosome non binary and gender fluid people (as long as they are not substituting hormons), trans women on estrogen and trans men who do not substitute testosterone.

So that would mean instead of "biological women" it would be "hormonal female" I guess, or what is the correct for that?

load more comments (25 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)