this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2024
163 points (90.1% liked)
Religious Cringe
820 readers
1 users here now
About
This is the official Lemmy for the r/ReligiousCringe***** subreddit. This is a community about poking fun at the religious fundamentalist's who take their religion a little bit too far. Here you will find religious content that is so outrageous and so cringeworthy that even someone who is mildly religious will cringe.
Rules
-
All posts must contain religious cringe. All posts must be made from a religious person or must be showcasing some kind of religious bigotry. The only exception to this is rule 2
-
Material about religious bigots made by non-bigots is only allowed from Friday-Sunday EST. In an effort to keep this community on the topic of religious cringe and bigotry we have decide to limit stuff like atheist memes to only the weekends.
-
No direct links to religious cringe. To prevent religious bigots from getting our clicks and views directs links to religious cringe are not allowed. If you must a post a screenshot of the site or use archive.ph. If it is a YouTube video please use a YouTube frontend like Piped or Invidious
-
No Proselytizing. Proselytizing is defined as trying to convert someone to a particular religion or certain world view. Doing so will get you banned.
-
Spammers and Trolls will be instantly banned. No exceptions.
Resources
International Suicide Hotlines
Non Religious Organizations
Freedom From Religion Foundation
Ex-theist Communities
Other Similar Communities
founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Because proving a negative is how things work now? What.
How about you prove he did exist, and not using "evidence" from a church affiliated "historian".
How about you disprove the evidence we have instead of pulling shit out of your ass? Start with why you think Josephus accounts aren't trustworthy.
You can't disprove a negative. You can keep "demanding" me to all you want, but it's not how things work.
What's the evidence you have?
All of the notes for Josephus on wikipedia are from people that were either associated with the church or wrote non-fiction books about religious leaders.
Take that as you will. I understand Faith is a strong thing, but evidence and science is how the world actually works.
You're rejecting evidence you haven't even read about, so yes. You get the burden of proof for now. You're making an assumption that every academic who says "there's enough evidence to suggest this person existed just not exactly how it's laid out in the bible" is some religious zealot. Show us proof.
What's the evidence?
I'm not going to link to a bunch of different papers for you since you can't be bothered to Google before you comment so here's a Wikipedia article. If you're here in good faith you'll know how to follow the sources and find the evidence, if not you'll reply with some more idiotic denialism.
There is evidence a "prophet named Jesus" existed. Of course "Jesus" was an extremely popular name. And there were tens of thousands of "Prophets" running around claiming they were the true one.
It's simple survivorship bias. There is ZERO evidence the biblical Jesus existed...
That's literally what the wiki article I linked to says.
That's fair. I don't mind looking into the article.
The first, and subsequently multiple, source in the article claiming that Jesus was real is from William R. Herzog. He was a Presbyterian minister.
Mark Allen Powel is also sourced. An ordained minister of the American Lutheran Church.
I'll look into more of it later, I've got things to do. But so far it's all church members affirming the belief.
I found one source linking to Herzog and Powel and it's the same claim that "the only historical fact we can confirm about Jesus in the Bible is that he was baptized and crucified."
Exactly. Not really trustworthy if you want actual evidence.
There are plenty of sources why do you insist on latching on to this specific sentence? The article is quite long.
This is a good lecture you might be interested in.
https://www.youtube.com/live/vPXA1NzAIpw?si=W8Wx-njZpl6c2y32
I just told you I have other things to do right now than research every link in the article. You're more than welcome to list anything you want to here. I'll look into it. I was simply responding to your comment.
I'm happy to debate it. But only if you're not being confrontational. It's not like either of us is going to "crack the code" or anything.