this post was submitted on 31 May 2024
5 points (66.7% liked)

Usenet

2033 readers
2 users here now

We are a thriving community dedicated to helping users old and new understand and use usenet

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The title says it all!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] weaponG 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

We may not all think alike or obtain the same Linux ISOs. I am okay with that and feel we all should be okay with differing opinions and viewpoints, especially in a secular society.

I defended the comedian Dave Chapelle and questioned the term "toxic masculinity" in 2 posts which lead to a long (and apparently scrutinized) comment history.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Based comment history. If I had any invites left I would have given it to you. I can't stand people who stalk people's comment history. It's friggin stupid

[–] weaponG 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Thanks. We reached that dystopian part where people are judged based on their social credits and "likability" and conformance index to the masses.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

It's truly insane.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I expect to be held liable for people I invite to other people's places, therefore I don't invite randos or people that have proven to have little regard for others.

[–] weaponG 4 points 6 months ago

Invitations and referrals do carry liability. However, I would say that if you have a differing opinion, others attack with little regard. The "mob mentality" is inert and affluent in social media. Then you are left to defend your differing viewpoint, leaving a trail of more dissenting comments which are also attacked to the nth degree. I honestly thought this federated experiment would be different. I was wrong.