this post was submitted on 29 May 2024
23 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

3644 readers
231 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @[email protected] who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @[email protected] and @[email protected]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] abhibeckert 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Um... the headline seems to be completely backwards.

Surely the councils that can't meet the target should get extra funding so they can meet the target?! From the the content of the article, that seems to be what is actually happening.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

New South Wales councils that meet and beat new housing targets will be given extra cash for sporting facilities, parks, footpaths and road maintenance as part of the state government’s push to build nearly 400,000 new homes over the next five years.

~~It seems to be more that housing is already being built but that councils can't afford to add the supporting infrastructure, so this will help with that. But this should also help with encouraging councils to meet those housing targets, when they know they'll get additional funding.~~

On closer read, I see what you mean. I think this may be the key point:

The government will set aside $200m in grants to encourage the dozens of councils with updated local housing targets to do more; money will go only to the councils that meet “key milestones”.

I assume those key milestones would not mean they've already met the new targets, but have shown progress on them. So councils that aren't making a sincere effort don't get the extra funding. Would be nice to see more detail and what the milestones are.