this post was submitted on 24 May 2024
41 points (97.7% liked)


5862 readers
5 users here now

Welcome to the Python community on the Lemmy instance!

πŸ“… Events

October 2023

November 2023

PastJuly 2023

August 2023

September 2023

🐍 Python project:
πŸ’“ Python Community:
✨ Python Ecosystem:
🌌 Fediverse

founded 1 year ago


you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (5 children)

You're still limited by lambda expressions though. And in general the language is still statement based, not expression based. You can't do a = if foo then x else y type things (except for the one-off and backwards x if foo else y; they were so close!).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

"a = x if foo else y" is a perfectly cromulent statement!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

It's not. In functional languages there's no special case like this. All if-elses are expressions. It's far superior. For example how do you do this with Python's if-else expression?

let x = if foo {
  let y = bar();
} else {
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

x = foo(y:=bar(), baz(), y) or z should work assuming foo bar and baz are functions being called?

if this is setting y to the effect of bar() + running baz after, then:

x = [bar(), baz()][0] or z

might work

and if you need y to be defined for later use:

x = [(y:=bar()), baz()][0] or z

but thats from memory, not sure if that will even run as written.

if I get to a real computer I'll try that with an actual if statement instead of a bastardized ternary.
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

foo isn't a function, it's a bool. But in any case, as you can see the answer is "with terrible hacks". Python is not a functional language. It is imperative.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, never said it was, just that if you really want to emulate that style you mostly can.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)