this post was submitted on 20 May 2024
144 points (98.6% liked)

PC Gaming

8505 readers
640 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
144
Next-gen AMD CPUs could feature up to 32 cores per die (www.pcgamesn.com)
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
38 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Linkerbaan 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

ARM isn't present either.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Aren't the new Apple chips ARM? If they are, then ARM is absolutely in the present, and proven viable for consumers by Apple.

[–] Linkerbaan 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It proves Apple is viable for consumers not ARM.

The Windows and Linux drivers for arm are severely lacking compared to MacOS Rosetta.

ARM is further in the development stage than RISC5 but both aren't near X86 for desktop compatibility yet.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If apple is viable for consumers, and apple uses ARM, then ARM is viable for consumers.

Windows and Linux being unfortunately behind is not an argument against ARM being viable, it shows it's not ready - however, apple was in the same situation before they moved to ARM, so theoretically Microsoft could attempt a similar investment and push towards ARM. Apple's control over both hardware and software certainly helped them, and went well for them.

That said, maybe it's a disagreement on terminology. When I say that ARM is viable, I mean that it's ready to create hardware and software that does what people need it to do. Apple clearly succeeded, now it's a question of if/when manufacturers start making open hardware and software starts compatibility... Or if maybe another option will succeed instead.

[–] Linkerbaan 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

RISCV is also viable to create hardware and software to do what people need.

The software just doesn't exist yet.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Maybe it is, maybe it isn't... But we have definitive proof ARM is, in the form of actual consumer systems on the market.

[–] Linkerbaan 1 points 5 months ago

ARM has been in consumer systems since Android.

We also have proof that ARM sucks for gaming and has many compatibility issues running X86 programs.

Is ARM more mature than RISCV? Yes definitely. But just like RISCV ARM is also not a replacement for X86. Especially when running games or professional proprietary garbage software X86 is still the way to go.