this post was submitted on 19 May 2024
18 points (95.0% liked)

Personal Finance

3829 readers
9 users here now

Learn about budgeting, saving, getting out of debt, credit, investing, and retirement planning. Join our community, read the PF Wiki, and get on top of your finances!

Note: This community is not region centric, so if you are posting anything specific to a certain region, kindly specify that in the title (something like [USA], [EU], [AUS] etc.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I wanted to start using a budgeting program to better organize my spending/ goals, and basically narrowed it down to 3 --YNAB, Actual and Quicken Simplifi.

I setup a self-hosted instance of Actual and was able to import my spending from my account by exporting from my bank and importing into the app, however this seemed like it might get tedious over time, so I decided to try YNAB.

So far this has been pretty straight forward. I’m still waiting for things to sync up with my linked accounts, but I like it so far. I would try Simplifi but there’s no trial period there; though the graphs and UI make it seem appealing.

Anyone here have any experience with Simplifi/ YNAB, and why might you chose one over the other?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Drukail 5 points 6 months ago

I've used YNAB on and off for about 20 years and solidly for the last 6 or so years and I generally like it. I don't have anything to compare it to because I haven't really used anything else. I tried Mint briefly, but didn't like it and it isn't option anymore anyway.

The price seems to be getting a bit high, but I would never switch to a free alternative. When it comes to my finances, I would prefer to pay for any services with a company that might be trustworthy. I haven't seen anything concerning about YNAB so far.

At this point, if I ever drop YNAB, I'll probably just switch to a spreadsheet. Maybe I'll even go back to the old spreadsheet version of YNAB; as far as I know, they still honor the old licenses for those.