this post was submitted on 18 May 2024
8 points (72.2% liked)
SimulationTheory
93 readers
4 users here now
A place for serious discussion of simulation theory.
Rules:
- No hate speech.
- Treat others with respect, no matter your agreement or disagreement.
- No low quality participation.
- Posts must clearly tie in with simulation theory or a submission statement must be added to explain the relevance to the topic.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Wow. So are you arguing that we need a gravitational theory that explains interactions at quantum scales and the quantum theory is likely mostly bunk?
No, in fact as long as it's impossible to measure the gravitational effects from quanta (which is currently the case) there doesn't seem to be an actual conflict. The theories around conflicts all entertain quantum behaviors at objects larger than what's been observed to date.
Quantum theory isn't 'bunk' - it's experimentally proven.
But I do think it's a side effect of simulation and that the macro continuous behavior of a theory like general relativity is the foundational behavior being modeled. It just can't be simulated that way with free agents, hence the conversion to quanta at the point of interaction.
Oh hmm. I'm not versed enough to understand this conversation. I did preorder the book that the author wrote, maybe that'll help