this post was submitted on 13 May 2024

272 points (83.8% liked)

World News

39163 readers

2756 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]

Recommendations

How to spot Misinformation and Propaganda

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

272

Secret Hamas Files Show How It Spied on Everyday Palestinians (www.nytimes.com)

submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by [email protected] to c/world

137 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar has for years overseen a secret police force in Gaza that conducted surveillance on everyday Palestinians and built files on young people, journalists and those who questioned the government, according to intelligence officials and a trove of internal documents reviewed by The New York Times.

The unit, known as the General Security Service, relied on a network of Gaza informants, some of whom reported their own neighbors to the police. People landed in security files for attending protests or publicly criticizing Hamas. In some cases, the records suggest that the authorities followed people to determine if they were carrying on romantic relationships outside marriage.

Hamas has long run an oppressive system of governance in Gaza, and many Palestinians there know that security officials watch them closely. But a 62-slide presentation on the activities of the General Security Service, delivered only weeks before the Oct. 7 attack on Israel, reveals the degree to which the largely unknown unit penetrated the lives of Palestinians.

. . .

Everyday Gazans were stuck — behind the wall of Israel’s crippling blockade and under the thumb and constant watch of a security force. That dilemma continues today, with the added threat of Israeli ground troops and airstrikes.

MBFC
Archive

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Aceticon 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

"Hamas is Evil, hence why we have to attack Rafah to get rid of them."

I mean, "Hamas is Evil hence everything is morally acceptable to getting rid of Hamas" is the sole foundation and support for ever single evil action of Israel such as destroying hospitals killing medical personnel ("they're Hamas", "Hamas was there", "there was a Hamas tunnel under it"), blow up entire blocks with 2000lb bombs ("we were targetting a Hamas operative"), blow up school playgrounds ("we were targetting a Hamas operative") and so on.

The more Evil Hamas is made to look the more "Moral" justification the IDF has to do destroy and murder everything Palestinian claiming that it's to "destroy Hamas", as Netanyahu frequently says.

There is literally no other moral argument from Israel for their Genocide. These people aren't even especially imaginative.

So this story is just adding another bit of cement on that very same structure supporting the actions "the most moral army in the World" and it's not even especially important: it even has the wiff of Military Intelligence bureaucrats coming up with something to show the boss they're doing some work and it getting published because the New York Times has no journalistic criteria at all when it comes to stories that portray pro-Israel in a good light (probably has no journalistic criteria at all for anything).

You need to be trying really, really hard to imitate the Three Wise Monkeys when it comes to Israel, to not yet have noticed that "we have to get rid of Evil Hamas" is their only justification for doing the most evil stuff imaginable.

Theirs is such a stupidly simple strategy that is painfully obvious for those with even the smallest amount of brains who aren't hasbara sockpuppets, no need for "propanda expertise" (whatever that is).

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

So that’s why you believe this is propaganda versus a true account of what’s happening?

For someone so adamant in their conviction it comes across weak af. I am much more inclined to believe the Palestinians. Your wall of text does not negate that fact.

Israel has finally lost in the court of public opinion, no matter the amount of manipulation

[–] Aceticon 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Conviction?!

You're clearly coming at it from the point of view of the indoctrinated - you pre-believe something (i.e. are prejudiced) and then seek a way to interpret reality to yield "conclusions" that match your conviction and are not at all even trying to analyse it rationally.

Any rational analysis of this "article" in the current context and given the past explicit biases and actions of those who participated in making it will yield the conclusion that what's in there has a high probablility of being Propaganda and cannot be trusted to be truthfull.

It really boils down a pretty old principle: "Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me". I totally understand defaulting to believe anything sourced from the IDF and delivered via the NYT in the past, before all this started, but at this point after all they said that turned out to be outright lies along with what they did using such lies as justification, we're very much on the domain of "shame on you" when it comes to such sources as the New York Times and the IDF.

Does it mean this article is with absolute certainty Propaganda and not actually true? Of course not: there is a small probability that it's not Propaganda, since like "Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction" there is a core of believability to it (which curiously is both like a true story AND like the best Propaganda), so only time will tell if it's mostly true or if, like the "weapons of mass destruction", it is just Propaganda.

The rational take on this article (so, not the take of those driven by something irrational like conviction, which is why I so often emphasied Skepticism and Analysis on my posts on this) is to treat it as having zero informational value, unless independent information arises that clarifies it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

You keep mentioning Iraq’s supposed Weapons of Mass Destruction justification which Bush spewed out. You might be surprised not everyone believed it. War is a racket, we know this. It is common knowledge not a propaganda conspiracy.

This article may be propaganda (highly doubt it though).but the Motives and intentions line up perfectly so yea I’m gonna believe the religious zealots are acting as religious zealots.