NASA

1007 readers
9 users here now

Anything related to the NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration); the latest news, events, current and future missions, and more.

Note: This community is an unofficial forum and is unaffiliated with NASA or the U.S. government.

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
176
 
 

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/5990279

Welcome to the Soyuz MS-23 Return Thread!

Welcome everyone!

| Undocking scheduled for (UTC) | 2023-09-27 07:55 | |


|


|

| Landing scheduled for (UTC) | 2023-09-27 11:17 | | Vehicle | Soyuz MS-23 | | Landing site | Kazakh Steppe, Kazakhstan | | Commander | Sergey Prokopyev 🇷🇺| | Flight Engineer 1 | Dmitry Petelin 🇷🇺| | Flight Engineer 2 | Francisco Rubio 🇺🇸| | Mission success criteria | Safe return of crew and cargo to Earth |

The crew of MS-23 actually launched on MS-22, but did not return on the vehicle as it was deemed unsafe following the cooling loop incident, so MS-23 was launched uncrewed as a replacement. The delay in return has resulted in Francisco Rubio becoming the first American to spend a full year or more in space, breaking Mark T. Vande Hei's record for the longest spaceflight by an American astronaut.

Livestreams

| Stream | Link | |


|


|

| NASA TV | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21X5lGlDOfg | | NASA Landing | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XAv2sKblPRc | | Roscosmos Hatch Closing | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JpVIYTAl2RI | | Roscosmos Undocking | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q55TZRjpOyQ | | Roscosmos Landing | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGuSG76-n8U |

Mission Details 🚀

NASA blog posts and press releases:

Please feel free to post updates and questions in the comments!

177
12
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/nasa
 
 

Welcome everyone!

About OSIRIS-REx

NASA’s OSIRIS-REx, the first U.S. mission to collect a sample from an asteroid, will return to Earth on Sept. 24, 2023, with material from asteroid Bennu. When it arrives, the OSIRIS-REx spacecraft will release the sample capsule for a safe landing in the Utah desert. The pristine material from Bennu – rocks and dust collected from the asteroid’s surface in 2020 – will offer generations of scientists a window into the time when the Sun and planets were forming about 4.5 billion years ago. NASA’s live coverage of the OSIRIS-REx sample capsule landing starts at 10 a.m. EDT (8 a.m. MDT).

Webcasts:

Other resources:

Please feel free to post updates and questions in the comments!

178
179
 
 

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/4547355

Welcome everyone!

| Scheduled for (UTC) | 2023-09-06 23:42 | |


|


|

| Scheduled for (local) | 2023-09-07 08:42 (JST) | | Launch site | LA-Y1, Tanegashima Space Center, Japan. | | Launch vehicle | H-IIA | | Mission success criteria | Successful launch and deployment of payloads into desired orbit |

Livestreams

| Stream | Link | |


|


|

| JAXA webcast | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ej4ZMp4a2xw |

Stats

☑️ 2nd launch from LA-Y1 this year

☑️ 3rd Japanese launch this year

☑️ 47th H-IIA mission

Payload info

SLIM

SLIM will be Japan's first lunar surface mission and will demonstrate a precise, pinpoint lunar landing. During its descent to the Moon, the lander will recognize lunar craters by applying technology from facial recognition systems, and determine its current location by utilizing observation data collected by the SELENE (Kaguya) lunar orbiter mission. SLIM aims to soft-land with an accuracy range of 100 m. In comparison, the accuracy of the Apollo 11 Eagle lunar module was an elliptic which was 20 km wide in downrange and 5 km wide in crossrange. According to Yoshifumi Inatani, deputy director general of the JAXA Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS), succeeding in this extremely precise landing, will lead to enhancing the quality of space exploration.

SLIM is planned to be launched together with the XRISM space telescope and is to land near the Marius Hills Hole, a lunar lava tube entrance discovered by Kaguya. The expected cost for developing this project is 18 billion yen.

| Target orbit | Trans Lunar Injection | |


|


|

XRISM

The X-Ray Imaging and Spectroscopy Mission (XRISM), formerly the X-ray Astronomy Recovery Mission (XARM), is an X-ray astronomy satellite of the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) to provide breakthroughs in the study of structure formation of the universe, outflows from galaxy nuclei, and dark matter. As the only international X-ray observatory project of its period, XRISM will function as a next-generation space telescope in the X-ray astronomy field, similar to how the James Webb Space Telescope, Fermi Space Telescope, and the ALMA Observatory are placed in their respective fields.

The mission is a stopgap for avoiding a potential observation period gap between X-ray telescopes of the present (Chandra, XMM-Newton) and that of the future (ATHENA, Lynx X-ray Observatory). Without XRISM, a blank period in X-ray astronomy may arise in the early 2020s due to the loss of Hitomi.

| Total Mass | 2,300 kg | |


|


|

| Target orbit | Low Earth Orbit |

180
37
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/nasa
 
 

JWST is on the right.

Below is a new picture from a week or two ago. NASA article

new JWST picture of the ring nebula

Some older pictures from JWST in different spectrum

ring nebula jwst

visual spectrum approximation?

Here's Hubble's pictures. They're still breathtaking too!

Hubble ring nebula

a more dull color version

181
 
 

You can see how much more Webb can peer through the dust in infra red light.

Another comparison

Full Cosmic Cliffs comparison

JWST cosmic cliffs at 3600x2085

Hubble cosmic cliffs at 1920x1080

Progressive reveal video

182
9
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by antangil to c/nasa
 
 

Okay, friends. In the spirit of “bringing stuff into the discussion that’s a level lower than press release”, here’s a presentation some of my co-workers authored for the International Astronautical Conference in Paris last fall.

The People

Michelle Rucker is the lead of the Mars Architecture Team - the group that is literally tasked with designing NASA’s approach to a crewed Mars mission.

Torin McCoy is the acting Chief Health and Medical Officer for the lunar-focused Artemis campaign, but he does some Mars stuff too.

James Hoffman has been around NASA’s Mars work for like 20 years. Couldn’t find a bio I liked, but y’all can trust me.

The References

You’ll want to have a few documents in your back pocket to reference as you’re reading.

The Moon to Mars Objectives are tough reading, and if y’all want we can do a deep dive. It describes how NASA is thinking about the things the agency (and all of the commercials and international interests) want to be able to do.

The Moon to Mars Strategy might be even tougher reading, but there’s additional context there on the “how”.

Some Thoughts

Take a look at the concept of operations. If you’d like, you can ask about other ways we might try to accomplish those objectives (can’t promise I can answer, but if NASA published it I’ll try to find it.)

Take a look at the surface mission, and think about the potential challenges of operating with those kinds of constraints. If you’d like, look at the crew recovery for a Crew Dragon and think about the impact of not having that infrastructure or expertise on the surface of Mars.

Think about the duration of the mission, and compare that to the shelf-life of things like food, medicine, and supplies. Forget about the whole space part… think about trying to go off-the-grid terrestrially and what you’d have to do to be successful.

Class is in session. Who wants to do some homework? 😄

183
 
 

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/3678091

Welcome to the /c/SpaceX Crew-7 Official Launch Discussion & Updates Thread!

Welcome everyone!

| Scheduled for (UTC) | Aug 26 2023, 07:27 | |


|


|

| Scheduled for (local) | Aug 26 2023, 03:27 AM (EDT) | |Docking scheduled for (UTC)| Aug 27 2023, 12:50 | | Mission | Crew-7 | | Weather Probability | 95% GO | | Launch site | LC-39A, Kennedy Space Center, FL, USA. | | Booster | B1081-1 | | Landing | B1081 will attempt to land back at the launch site after its first flight. | | Dragon | Endurance C210-3| | Commander | Jasmin Moghbeli 🇺🇸| | Pilot | Andreas Mogensen 🇩🇰| | Mission Specialist | Konstantin Borisov 🇷🇺| | Mission Specialist | Satoshi Furukawa 🇯🇵| | Mission success criteria | Successful launch and docking to the ISS |

Livestreams

| Stream | Link | |


|


|

| SpaceX Hosted | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5KeIAYTW8eQ | | SpaceX Mission Control | TBD | | NASA Hosted | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QD2XDoeT8SI |

Stats

☑️ 272nd SpaceX launch all time

☑️ 219th Falcon Family Booster landing

☑️ 29th landing on LZ-1

☑️ 234th consecutive successful Falcon 9 launch (excluding Amos-6) (if successful)

☑️ 59th SpaceX launch this year

☑️ 9th launch from LC-39A this year

☑️ 28 days, 4:23:00 turnaround for this pad

Mission Details 🚀

Link Source
SpaceX mission website SpaceX
NASA blog NASA
184
185
38
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/nasa
 
 

shuttle landscape blueprint

first stage reusable blueprints

saturn v and starship

There are some others too if anyone wants to Google around. Sorry for the relatively low quality, they get reposted a lot.

186
187
 
 

I have been lifted from the depths of my despair by the responses on that other thread from our doughty band of lurkers.

Let’s see if we can ride this high for a bit. New question - what would you like to see to distinguish this community from a generic space community? I’m gonna throw out a couple thoughts based on things I could actually pull off. Interested in positive/negative feedback. Interested in “yes, and”.

Just to put a little structure on this, let’s make top comments suggestions and put feedback in the threads. 

188
102
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by antangil to c/nasa
 
 

Hey folks (if folks there be)! I’m one of the new mods for this small community. I’m not by nature a huge poster of content (too many interactions with STRIVES, too many briefings on CUI/ITAR/Limited Rights 🤐)… but I feel like y’all are even tighter-lipped than me.

So. I’m going to throw this post out, looking for signs of life. Interested to know whether there’s a niche this community could be filling, interested to know whether the content creators have migrated back to Reddit. Interested to know if there’s a feature or element of the site that is hindering participation.

If this goes unanswered, I’m probably going to propose to have the community eliminated (is that even a thing?) or taken private and held in trust for the next group that want to have a go. A dusty, inactive channel is a bad look when the agency and the world of space in general is so vibrant.

Thoughts?

189
190
 
 

The link shows the mission and scientific goals of Russia’s Luna 25 mission. The part left out is the geopolitical statement… “Russia can still do Moon things.” Luna 25 is theoretically the first step in Russia’s crewed lunar lander ambitions.

191
5
submitted 1 year ago by antangil to c/nasa
 
 

NASA’s website has been kind of a mess for a long time, and NASAWatch’s lovable curmudgeon Keith Cowling doesn’t seem to think things have gotten much better.

192
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/3347038

Years before she was even sure the James Webb Space Telescope would successfully launch, Christina Eilers started planning a conference for astronomers specializing in the early universe. She knew that if — preferably, when — JWST started making observations, she and her colleagues would have a lot to talk about. Like a time machine, the telescope could see farther away and farther into the past than any previous instrument.

Fortunately for Eilers (and the rest of the astronomical community), her planning was not for naught: JWST launched and deployed without a hitch, then started scrutinizing the early universe in earnest from its perch in space a million miles away.

In mid-June, about 150 astronomers gathered at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology for Eilers’ JWST “First Light” conference. Not quite a year had passed since JWST started sending images back to Earth. And just as Eilers had anticipated, the telescope was already reshaping astronomers’ understanding of the cosmos’s first billion years. A headshot of Eilers. She’s wearing a navy blue shirt.

Before JSWT even launched, Christina Eilers, an astronomer at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, started organizing a conference to discuss the telescope’s observations of the early universe.

Courtesy of Christina Eilers

One set of enigmatic objects stood out in the myriad presentations. Some astronomers called them “hidden little monsters.” To others, they were “little red dots.” But whatever their name, the data was clear: When JWST stares at young galaxies — which appear as mere red specks in the darkness — it sees a surprising number with cyclones churning in their centers.

“There seems to be an abundant population of sources we didn’t know about,” said Eilers, an astronomer at MIT, “which we didn’t anticipate finding at all.”

In recent months, a torrent of observations of the cosmic smudges has delighted and confounded astronomers.

“Everybody is talking about these little red dots,” said Xiaohui Fan, a researcher at the University of Arizona who has spent his career searching for distant objects in the early universe.

The most straightforward explanation for the tornado-hearted galaxies is that large black holes weighing millions of suns are whipping the gas clouds into a frenzy. That finding is both expected and perplexing. It is expected because JWST was built, in part, to find the ancient objects. They are the ancestors of billion-sun behemoth black holes that seem to appear in the cosmic record inexplicably early. By studying these precursor black holes, such as three record-setting youngsters discovered this year, scientists hope to learn where the first humongous black holes came from and perhaps identify which of two competing theories better describes their formation: Did they grow extremely rapidly, or were they simply born big? Yet the observations are also perplexing because few astronomers expected JWST to find so many young, hungry black holes — and surveys are turning them up by the dozen. In the process of attempting to solve the former mystery, astronomers have uncovered a throng of bulky black holes that may rewrite established theories of stars, galaxies and more.

“As a theorist, I have to build a universe,” said Marta Volonteri, an astrophysicist specializing in black holes at the Paris Institute of Astrophysics. Volonteri and her colleagues are now contending with the influx of giant black holes in the early cosmos. “If they are [real], they completely change the picture.” A Cosmic Time Machine

The JWST observations are shaking up astronomy in part because the telescope can detect light reaching Earth from deeper in space than any earlier machine.

We built this absurdly powerful telescope over 20 years.

Grant Tremblay, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics

“We built this absurdly powerful telescope over 20 years,” said Grant Tremblay, an astrophysicist at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. “The whole point of it originally was to look deep into cosmic time.”

One of the mission’s goals is to catch galaxies in the act of forming during the universe’s first billion years (out of its roughly 13.8-billion-year history). The telescope’s initial observations from last summer hinted at a young universe full of strikingly mature galaxies, but the information astronomers could wring from such images was limited. To really understand the early universe, astronomers needed more than just the images; they hungered for the spectra of those galaxies — the data that comes in when the telescope breaks incoming light into specific hues.

Galactic spectra, which JWST started to send back in earnest at the end of last year, are useful for two reasons.

First, they let astronomers nail down the galaxy’s age. The infrared light JWST collects is reddened, or redshifted, meaning that as it traverses the cosmos, its wavelengths are stretched by the expansion of space. The extent of that redshift lets astronomers determine a galaxy’s distance, and therefore when it originally emitted its light. Nearby galaxies have a redshift of almost zero. JWST can handily make out objects beyond a redshift of 5, which corresponds to roughly 1 billion years after the Big Bang. Objects at higher redshifts are significantly older and farther away. Volonteri is sitting in an auditorium, smiling at the camera. She’s wearing a black shirt.

A theorist at the Paris Institute of Astrophysics, Marta Volonteri has long searched for ways to explain how black holes in the early universe bulked up so quickly.

Renata Charikiopoulos

Second, spectra give astronomers a sense of what’s happening in a galaxy. Each hue marks an interaction between photons and specific atoms (or molecules). One color originates from a hydrogen atom flashing as it settles down after a bump; another indicates jostled oxygen atoms, and another nitrogen. A spectrum is a pattern of colors that reveals what a galaxy is made of and what those elements are doing, and JWST is providing that crucial context for galaxies at unprecedented distances.

“We’ve made such a huge leap,” said Aayush Saxena, an astronomer at the University of Oxford. The fact that “we’re talking about chemical composition of redshift 9 galaxies is just absolutely remarkable.”

(Redshift 9 is mind-bogglingly distant, corresponding to a time when the universe was a mere 0.55 billion years old.)

Galactic spectra are also perfect tools for finding a major perturber of atoms: giant black holes that lurk at the hearts of galaxies. Black holes themselves are dark, but when they feed on gas and dust, they rip atoms apart, making them beam out telltale colors. Long before JWST’s launch, astrophysicists hoped the telescope would help them spot those patterns and find enough of the early universe’s biggest and most active black holes to solve the mystery of how they formed. Too Big, Too Early

The mystery began more than 20 years ago, when a team led by Fan spotted one of the most distant galaxies ever observed — a brilliant quasar, or a galaxy anchored to an active supermassive black hole weighing perhaps billions of suns. It had a redshift of 5, corresponding to around 1.1 billion years after the Big Bang. With further sweeps of the sky, Fan and his colleagues repeatedly broke their own records, pushing the quasar redshift frontier to 6 in 2001 and eventually to 7.6 in 2021 ­­— just 0.7 billion years after the Big Bang.

The problem was that making such gigantic black holes seemed impossible so early in cosmic history.

Like any object, black holes take time to grow and form. And like a 6-foot-tall toddler, Fan’s supersize black holes were too big for their age — the universe wasn’t old enough for them to have accrued billions of suns of heft. To explain those overgrown toddlers, physicists were forced to consider two distasteful options. Fan is standing in front of an astronomical backdrop in which swirling galaxies are surrounded by sparkling stars.

Decades ago, Xiaohui Fan, an astronomer at the University of Arizona, helped discover a string of quasars — bright supermassive black holes — whose extreme youth and size defied standard theories of black hole formation.

Tod Lauer

The first was that Fan’s galaxies started off filled with standard, roughly stellar-mass black holes of the sort supernovas often leave behind. Those then grew both by merging and by swallowing up surrounding gas and dust. Normally, if a black hole feasts aggressively enough, an outpouring of radiation pushes away its morsels. That stops the feeding frenzy and sets a speed limit for black hole growth that scientists call the Eddington limit. But it’s a soft ceiling: A constant torrent of dust could conceivably overcome the outpouring of radiation. However, it’s hard to imagine sustaining such “super-Eddington” growth for long enough to explain Fan’s beasts — they would have had to bulk up unthinkably fast.

Or perhaps black holes can be born improbably large. Gas clouds in the early universe may have collapsed directly into black holes weighing many thousands of suns — producing objects called heavy seeds. This scenario is hard to stomach too, because such large, lumpy gas clouds should fracture into stars before forming a black hole.

One of JWST’s priorities is to evaluate these two scenarios by peering into the past and catching the fainter ancestors of Fan’s galaxies. These precursors wouldn’t quite be quasars, but galaxies with somewhat smaller black holes on their way to becoming quasars. With JWST, scientists have their best chance of spotting black holes that have barely started to grow — objects that are young enough and small enough for researchers to nail down their birth weight.

That’s one reason a group of astronomers with the Cosmic Evolution Early Release Science Survey, or CEERS, led by Dale Kocevski of Colby College, started working overtime when they first noticed signs of such young black holes popping up in the days following Christmas.

“It’s kind of impressive how many of these there are,” wrote Jeyhan Kartaltepe, an astronomer at the Rochester Institute of Technology, during a discussion on Slack.

“Lots of little hidden monsters,” Kocevski replied.

Samuel Velasco/Quanta Magazine A Growing Crowd of Monsters

In the CEERS spectra, a few galaxies immediately leapt out as potentially hiding baby black holes — the little monsters. Unlike their more vanilla siblings, these galaxies emitted light that didn’t arrive with just one crisp shade for hydrogen. Instead, the hydrogen line was smeared, or broadened, into a range of hues, indicating that some light waves were squished as orbiting gas clouds accelerated toward JWST (just as an approaching ambulance emits a rising wail as its siren’s soundwaves are compressed) while other waves were stretched as clouds flew away. Kocevski and his colleagues knew that black holes were just about the only object capable of slinging hydrogen around like that.

It always felt like at high redshift these quasars were just the tip of the iceberg.

Stéphanie Juneau, astronomer at the National Science Foundation’s NOIRLab

“The only way to see the broad component of the gas orbiting the black hole is if you’re looking right down the barrel of the galaxy and right into the black hole,” Kocevski said.

By the end of January, the CEERS team had managed to crank out a preprint describing two of the “hidden little monsters,” as they called them. Then the group set out to systematically study a wider swath of the hundreds of galaxies collected by their program to see just how many black holes were out there. But they got scooped by another team, led by Yuichi Harikane of the University of Tokyo, just weeks later. Harikane’s group searched 185 of the most distant CEERS galaxies and found 10 with broad hydrogen lines — the likely work of million-solar-mass central black holes at redshifts between 4 and 7. Then in June, an analysis of two other surveys led by Jorryt Matthee of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich identified 20 more “little red dots” with broad hydrogen lines: black holes churning around redshift 5. An analysis posted in early August announced another dozen, a few of which may even be in the process of growing by merging.

“I’ve been waiting for these things for so long,” Volonteri said. “It’s been incredible.”

But few astronomers anticipated the sheer number of galaxies with a big, active black hole. The baby quasars in JWST’s first year of observations are more numerous than scientists had predicted based on the census of adult quasars — between 10 times and 100 times more abundant. Share this article Copied!

Newsletter

Get Quanta Magazine delivered to your inbox Recent newsletters A portrait of Kocevski with a huge spiral galaxy in the background. The galaxy is blurred and Kocevski is in focus.

Dale Kocevski, an astronomer at Colby College and a member of the CEERS team, was stunned to find that so many galaxies in the early universe appear to be anchored to voracious supermassive black holes.

Gabe Souza Introduction

“It’s surprising for an astronomer that we were off by an order of magnitude or even more,” said Eilers, who contributed to the little-red-dots paper.

“It always felt like at high redshift these quasars were just the tip of the iceberg,” said Stéphanie Juneau, an astronomer at the National Science Foundation’s NOIRLab and a co-author of the little-monsters paper. “We might be finding that underneath, this [fainter] population is even bigger than just the regular iceberg.” These Two Go to Almost 11

But to catch glimpses of the beasts in their infancy, astronomers know they’ll have to push well beyond redshifts of 5 and look deeper into the universe’s first billion years. Recently, several teams have spotted black holes feeding at truly unprecedented distances.

In March, a CEERS analysis led by Rebecca Larson, an astrophysicist at the University of Texas, Austin, discovered a broad hydrogen line in a galaxy at a redshift of 8.7 (0.57 billion years after the Big Bang), setting a new record for most distant active black hole ever discovered.

But Larson’s record fell just a few months later, after astronomers with the JADES (JWST Advanced Deep Extragalactic Survey) collaboration got their hands on the spectrum of GN-z11. At redshift 10.6, GN-z11 had been at the faintest edge of the Hubble Space Telescope’s vision, and scientists were eager to study it with sharper eyes. By February, JWST had spent more than 10 hours observing GN-z11, and researchers could tell right away that the galaxy was an oddball. Its abundance of nitrogen was “completely out of whack,” said Jan Scholtz, a JADES member at the University of Cambridge. Seeing so much nitrogen in a young galaxy was like meeting a 6-year-old with a five o’clock shadow, especially when the nitrogen was compared to the galaxy’s meager stores of oxygen, a simpler atom that stars should assemble first.

That’s when we realized we were staring right into the accretion disk of the black hole.

Jan Scholtz, University of Cambridge

The JADES collaboration followed up with another 16 or so JWST observing hours in early May. The additional data sharpened the spectrum, revealing that two visible shades of nitrogen were extremely uneven — one bright and one faint. The pattern, the team said, indicated that GN-z11 was full of dense gas clouds concentrated by a fearsome gravitational force.

“That’s when we realized we were staring right into the accretion disk of the black hole,” Scholtz said. That fortuitous alignment explains why the distant galaxy was bright enough for Hubble to see in the first place.

Extremely young, hungry black holes like GN-z11 are the exact objects astrophysicists hoped would resolve the quandary of how Fan’s quasars came to be. But in a twist, it turns out that not even the superlative GN-z11 is young enough or small enough for researchers to conclusively determine its birth mass.

“We need to start detecting black hole masses at way higher redshift even than 11,” Scholtz said. “I had no idea I would be saying this a year ago, but here we are.” A Hint of Heaviness

Until then, astronomers are resorting to more subtle tricks for finding and studying newborn black holes, tricks like phoning a friend — or another flagship space telescope — for help.

In early 2022, a team led by Ákos Bogdán, an astronomer at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, started periodically pointing NASA’s Chandra X-ray Observatory at a galaxy cluster they knew would be on JWST’s short list. The cluster acts like a lens. It bends the fabric of space-time and magnifies the more distant galaxies behind it. The team wanted to see if any of those background galaxies were spitting out X-rays, a traditional calling card of a voracious black hole.

Over the course of a year, Chandra stared at the cosmic lens for two weeks — one of its longest observation campaigns yet — and collected 19 X-ray photons coming from a galaxy called UHZ1, at a redshift of 10.1. Those 19 high-octane photons most likely came from a growing black hole that existed fewer than half a billion years after the Big Bang, making it by far the most distant X-ray source ever detected.

Jan Scholtz and Aayush Saxena are members of the JADES team, which analyzed the spectrum of a distant galaxy and found it to contain a vigorously feeding black hole.

Clarissa Cahill (left); Tucker Jones Introduction

By combining the JWST and Chandra data, the group learned something strange — and informative. In most modern galaxies, almost all the mass is in the stars, with less than a percent or so in the central black hole. But in UHZ1, mass seems evenly split between the stars and the black hole — which is not the pattern astronomers would have expected for super-Eddington accretion.

A more plausible explanation, the team suggested, is that UHZ1’s central black hole was born when a giant cloud crumpled into a humongous black hole, leaving little gas behind for making stars. These observations “could be consistent with a heavy seed,” said Tremblay, who is a member of the team. It’s “crazy to think about these giant, giant balls of gas that just collapse.” It’s a Black Hole Universe

Some of the specific findings from the mad spectra scramble over the last few months are bound to shift as the studies go through peer review. But the broad conclusion — that the young universe cranked out a host of giant, active black holes extremely quickly — is likely to survive. After all, Fan’s quasars had to come from somewhere.

“The exact numbers and the details of each object remain uncertain, but it’s very convincing that we’re finding a large population of accreting black holes,” Eilers said. “JWST has revealed them for the first time, and that’s very exciting.”

For black hole specialists, it’s a revelation that has been brewing for years. Recent studies of messy adolescent galaxies in the modern universe hinted that active black holes in young galaxies were being overlooked. And theorists have struggled because their digital models continually produced universes with far more black holes than astronomers were seeing in the real one.

“I always said my theory is wrong and observation is right, so I need to fix my theory,” Volonteri said. Yet maybe the discrepancy wasn’t pointing to a problem with the theory. “Perhaps these little red dots were not being accounted for,” she said.

Now that blazing black holes are turning out to be more than just cosmic cameos in a maturing universe, astrophysicists wonder if recasting the objects in meatier theoretical roles could alleviate some other headaches.

After studying some of JWST’s first images, some astronomers quickly pointed out that certain galaxies seemed impossibly heavy, considering their youth. But in at least some cases, a blindingly bright black hole could be leading researchers to overestimate the heft of the surrounding stars.

Another theory that may need tweaking is the rate at which galaxies churn out stars, which tends to be too high in galaxy simulations. Kocevski speculates that many galaxies go through a hidden-monster phase that sets up a star formation slowdown; they start off cocooned in star-crafting dust, and then their black hole grows powerful enough to scatter the star stuff into the cosmos, slowing star formation. “We might be looking at that scenario in play,” he said.

As astronomers lift the veil of the early universe, academic hunches outnumber concrete answers. For as much as JWST is already changing how astronomers think about active black holes, researchers know that the cosmic vignettes revealed by the telescope this year are but anecdotes compared with what’s to come. Observing campaigns like JADES and CEERS have found dozens of likely black holes staring back at them from slivers of sky roughly one-tenth the size of the full moon. Many more baby black holes await the attention of the telescope and its astronomers.

“All of this progress has been made in the first nine to 12 months,” Saxena said. “Now we have [JWST] for the next nine or 10 years.”

Clarification August 14, 2023: This article has been revised to clarify that Ákos Bogdán is the leader of the team that used the Chandra X-ray Observatory to study galaxy clusters.

193
 
 

NASA Live

All times U.S. Eastern Daylight Time, which equates to UTC-4.

NEXT LIVE EVENTS

Monday, August 14

11 a.m. – News conference with NASA Administrator Bill Nelson, NASA climate experts, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) on the latest climate data findings

12:10 p.m. – ISS Expedition 69 in-flight educational event for Kingfisher High School in Kingfisher, Oklahoma with NASA flight engineers Frank Rubio and Steve Bowen

1:50 p.m. – ISS Expedition 69 in-flight educational event for Odyssey Academy in Galveston, Texas with NASA flight engineers Frank Rubio and Steve Bowen

3:30 p.m. – NASA Science Live discusses the summer of record-breaking temperatures

194
 
 

Astronomers determined that the planet’s spin is increasing by about 4 milliarcseconds per year², or shortening the length of a Martian day by a fraction of a millisecond per year. A Martian day lasts about 40 minutes longer than a day on Earth.

The increased acceleration seems incredibly small, and researchers aren’t quite sure what is causing it. However, they suggest it might be due to ice accumulation at the Martian poles or the rise of landmasses after being covered in ice. When a planet’s mass shifts in this way, it can cause the planet’s spin to accelerate.

195
25
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by LW_NewModWanted to c/nasa
 
 

We noticed this community was abandoned by its previous moderators, and so we’re here to help it thrive again!

We’re looking for new moderators to help make this a truly awesome community. Keep in mind that as a moderator, it would be up to you to make sure all posts are following the Lemmy.World’s rules, and your own community rules.

Server rules can be found on https://lemmy.world/legal

If you are interested in moderating this community, please reply to this post with your time zone and availability.

196
197
198
199
2
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Lowburn to c/nasa
 
 

This video, a scientific visualization of the galaxies captured as a part of the CEERS (Cosmic Evolution Early Release Science) Survey, showcases a large undertaking by NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope. It flies by thousands of galaxies, starting with those nearby and ending with less-developed galaxies in the very distant universe, including one never seen before Webb.

Visualization credits (NASA in partnership with the Space Telescope Science Institute): Frank Summers (STScI), Greg Bacon (STScI), Joseph DePasquale (STScI), Leah Hustak (STScI), Joseph Olmsted (STScI), Alyssa Pagan (STScI)

200
 
 

What a year it has been for JWST! The cosmology books are already being rewritten.

view more: ‹ prev next ›