Photography

4948 readers
1 users here now

c/photography is a community centered on the practice of amateur and professional photography. You can come here to discuss the gear, the technique and the culture related to the art of photography. You can also share your work, appreciate the others' and constructively critique each others work.

Please, be sure to read the rules before posting.

THE RULES

  1. Be nice to each other

This Lemmy Community is open to civil, friendly discussion about our common interest, photography. Excessively rude, mean, unfriendly, or hostile conduct is not permitted.

  1. Keep content on topic

All discussion threads must be photography related such as latest gear or art news, gear acquisition advices, photography related questions, etc...

  1. No politics or religion

This Lemmy Community is about photography and discussion around photography, not religion or politics.

  1. No classified ads or job offers

All is in the title. This is a casual discussion community.

  1. No spam or self-promotion

One post, one photo in the limit of 3 pictures in a 24 hours timespan. Do not flood the community with your pictures. Be patient, select your best work, and enjoy.

  1. If you want contructive critiques, use [Critique Wanted] in your title.

  2. Flair NSFW posts (nudity, gore, ...)

  3. Do not share your portfolio (instagram, flickr, or else...)

The aim of this community is to invite everyone to discuss around your photography. If you drop everything with one link, this become pointless. Portfolio posts will be deleted. You can however share your portfolio link in the comment section if another member wants to see more of your work.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
101
 
 
102
 
 
103
39
Noctilucent clouds (lemmy.world)
submitted 5 months ago by zarlin to c/[email protected]
 
 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noctilucent_cloud

Shot with a Sony a6000 with a Sigma 30mm prime lens

104
50
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
 

A few days ago, I got myself a Canon EOS 700D DSLR camera along with a Canon EFS 18-55mm lens for about $160. Until now, I've only ever used point-and-shoots, like my smartphone or my "Kodak" Pixpro AZ401.

So, it's basically the first time I get to properly play around with the exposure triangle and all that good, manual stuff. I already love this camera, because despite the low cost, you can get great shots in auto mode out of the box, but it's also very versatile in professional photography. All that, and I still haven't even gotten into editing raw photos; this is just the JPG!

This particular photo of a garden shed was shot with:

ISO: 6400
Exposure: 1/395s
Aperture: f/14
Focal length: 46mm
Resolution: 5184x3456

From what I've heard, those settings aren't ideal, especially the high ISO for that much light. Does anybody have some general tips for me or resources to check out?

By the way, I also just installed Magic Lantern. That's some great stuff. Oh, and also - if anyone has a good way to connect it as a webcam on Linux, that's also very welcome since EOS Utility doesn't work and Gphoto2 is very low-res. The first thing I didn't get properly running on Linux!

105
 
 
106
 
 
107
17
Splash (aussie.zone)
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
 

Shot on 110 format Lomo Tiger 200 with a little Minolta Pocket Autopak 460TX.

108
 
 
109
 
 
110
 
 

I have a Canon EOS R50, a mirrorless camera, which also seems shutterless - If I take pictures of, for example, an airplane with a spinning propeller, will I still get that "strange rubber propeller" effect? 1) the camera may have a shutter and I just don't recognize it or 2) the sensor is read in such a way as to produce the effect.

111
 
 
112
 
 

Some years ago, I saw a neat photo collage centered around power lines by some artist, and thought it was a neat idea. Here's my attempt at making one using photos I've taken on my phone throughout the years. This was a project i did a while ago, and thought you might appreciate seeing, even if it's a bit jank in some spots. I wanted to share the before photo of the power lines, but can't find the original DNG file, nor the Photoshop project file. ~~I'll go for a walk to find the original spot i took the image at as proof :)~~

Found the rough spot I took the base picture in. Yes, I did remove the 2nd tower in the edit

113
84
Red Bloom (files.catbox.moe)
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
 
114
45
Raven (lemmy.world)
submitted 5 months ago by ShadowCatEXE to c/[email protected]
 
 

If you look closely, he's actually going after a fly.

115
 
 
116
 
 

Fujifilm XT-5, Sigma 600mm Mirror f 8 / ISO 600 / 1/500 s

117
 
 

Mount Pleasant, IA Fujifilm X-T5 Fujinon 16-80:4 f 5.6 / ISO 225 / 30 s 720 nm infrared filter

118
 
 

Most of my photography has been of relatively stationary subjects, where I just use single-servo AF and either focus & recompose or move the single focus point to where in the frame I want the subject, or largely-individual sports like triathlon. But I've struggled getting sharp shots in team sports photography with a large number of moving people in frame.

If I try using continuous autofocus, it often focuses on the wrong subject or the background or seemingly nothing at all. If I try falling back on the techniques that work in other contexts, I usually just can't get the shot off at the right time.

I don't really understand the different autofocus options on my camera. I was mostly using what it calls "3D", but I also briefly tried "group-area". I don't really understand how group-area differs from d9 or even 3D. And my camera's manual doesn't clear things up for me. I spent a little while in manual autofocus with a fairly closed aperture, by using autofocus and then switching to manual and leaving it untouched; but this only worked when play stayed roughly the same distance from the camera for a while, so didn't really scale well.

Separate from the focus question, I spent the afternoon shooting at 1/1600. I'm not completely sure if this is fast enough, and maybe some of the blur in my photos is actually better explained by camera shake (shooting at 200 mm on a 1.5x crop sensor) or movement of the subjects. I suspect it's probably not relevant, but I thought I'd mention it just in case.

What's the best advice for how to get sharp shots in team sports photography?

(Included photo is a SOOC jpeg of a set play on the opposite side of the field from where I was...a situation that minimised my chance of focus problems.)

119
 
 
120
 
 
121
106
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
 

Shot on an old Nikon d5100, edited on photoshop. Had to scale the image to 25% of it's original size as i dont want to waste 50mb on people's instances.

122
 
 
123
16
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
 

The front image is a comparison of my new lens and old lens on the same settings from a tripod with a little lighting, it's an adorable platelet figure from 働く細胞 which is a great cute manga or anime series if you looking for a new one!

I recently got back into photography, I like to take photographs of aircraft overhead, I haven't been to an airshow yet but I think that would be fun.

Anyhow, I've been taking photos with a very old canon 600D my grandfather used to own. I have been using a Tamron 70-300mm f4-5.6 LD Di Lens. But it's basically dead as the zoom control doesn't even work but I did manage to take a couple pictures with it!

But what just arrived was a Sigma 70-300mm f4-5.5 DG OS Lens which is a nice small upgrade since it has image stabilisation and a much sharper image possible! So hopefully I can get some nice pictures with it soon! Sadly weather hasn't been good yet and nothing cool has flown over :(

This is just a upgrade I'm doing so I actually have a usable lens while I save for what a really want, a Sigma 100-400mm f5-6.3 DG OS HSM Contemporary Lens or even a Sigma 150-600mm f5-6.3 Contemporary DG OS HSM Lens.

Hopefully I'll get some nice pics real soon! Thanks for reading

124
 
 

“We’re spending less on photographers, image banks, and marketing agencies, our in-house marketing team is HALF the size it was last year but is producing MORE!”

125
55
Moose (lemmy.world)
submitted 5 months ago by ShadowCatEXE to c/[email protected]
 
 

view more: ‹ prev next ›