I only found it useful doing trivial chores such as converting between data structures, maybe create a test for a function, parsing and some regex. Anything deeper than that was full of errors or the it offered was suboptimal at best. It also fails a lot of times in fetching the relevant docs/sources for the discussion. I gave up trying after so many times it basically told me " go search for yourself"
wondrous_strange
joined 8 months ago
The real question in my opinion is how does a pro truly benefit from it other than being a different type of a search engine
I wish we all did
The word you need to use is 'slaves'.
The best is yet to come
Do one with 1984
Consider using github. You could have as many repos/branches per topic/year/whatever and you did not list any need for privacy so the repositories could be public and read only for everyone but you.
There also a built in code editor(IDE)
You can also push binary files
I hope you get paid well since it sounds like a tough job!!
The only appropriate thing to do is stealing them
You mean join the wait list to use it
view more: next ›
I very much agree with your conclusions and general approach.
LLMs are great for certain tasks that are programming related and it does it very well. I, too, often find myself needing scripts that as long as they did what they were suppose to, I really didn't care how.
Another thing I've noticed(which is probably related to amounts of training data) is that it can help better with simple Python tasks as opposed to how it handles simple rust tasks.
But you mentioned one of my main issues with. Ice been programming for 15 years or so, and still learning. All the available llms did crucial errors about fundamental tabd complex topics and got the answer so very wrong but also sounding very convincing. Couple it with lack of proper linking to the sources of the response, you might see why having it explain code might cause your learn wrongly. Although it is also possible to say this about randoms internet tutorials. I always try to remind myself that it's a tool that produces output that always needs to be verified.