I might suggest a fifth item for your list, which has to do with whether you, as a non-minority, are appropriating something that a minority has been given a hard time for. For instance, a number of Black hairstyles have been denigrated for generations, leading to people having to deal with damaging, toxic, expensive, time consuming chemical treatments to achieve more culturally acceptable hair. So when non-minority people wear cornrows or dreadlocks to be trendy, especially while Black people are still being made to feel uncomfortable (or being discriminated against) for wearing the same styles, that can sting in a different way. This isn't limited to cultural characteristics, but it's a sensitive aspect of appropriation that includes cultural stuff.
lovely_reader
If you're talking about your computer and you have access to its keyboard, you can't beat screenshot keyboard shortcuts!
But if you're talking about your TV or some screen you're not in control of, fair enough. For anyone wondering, the reason this is tough to correct with an app is because your little bitty lens is trying to capture a grid of millions of LEDs to your itty bitty camera's sensor, which has its own pixel grid that almost certainly doesn't match up with the grid you're photographing. Also, photographing a colored light source makes white balance tricky for any camera, and this is a bunch of light sources that are kind of in motion, because LEDs give off rapid pulses of light, not a steady light. Modern camera apps are getting better at antialiasing to smooth it all out and using AI models to try to guess what the image was supposed to look like, but you'll usually still see some Moire effect from those mismatched grids. I wonder if we'll ever see a solution to this while LED screens continue to exist in their current form.
We're pretty lucky we can capture a shitty image of what's onscreen, though. Just ask anybody who's tried to photograph a CRT.
I don't doubt that there are lessons to learn from the SPE, but it's also worth noting that it's been widely criticized for various biases and influences and lack of controls, and that no other researchers have ever been able to replicate its findings. Some might call it debunked, others perhaps not, but I think it's fair to say it isn't generally accepted as gospel.
This story is inspiring. I feel like there are a lot of people who wouldn't feel like it's within reach (no building/renovating skills or experience, or certain neighborhoods that maybe don't feel safe to a single woman for instance, and yeah schools as you mentioned if you're a parent or planning to be)—but for the people who can do that, it sounds like an absolutely phenomenal route to take.
I was struggling to find the right way to phrase the question, and I failed. I guess what I really wanted to know was: for a typical working class person, is a house at that price within reach? Or if you move there for the cheap houses and get a job, do you end up still barely able to afford the payments?
Leaders will. The poor ignorant voters who thought they were promised positive change will be totally boned.
How's the job market?
It's a fine thing to do if you're trying to show someone your data without inviting them to change it, intentionally or otherwise.
The phrase came originally from Wayne's World, which was first an SNL sketch, yeah. Bill & Ted aren't from SNL, though, and predate Wayne and Garth by a good bit. Bill & Ted said "party on," among other things, but not "party time, excellent." That's specifically the Wayne's World theme song iirc.
(as a millennial, I avoid self checkout because massive corporations are eliminating jobs without reducing prices and I think that's bullshit)
Like where? I'm curious to look at the style guides from there.
I respect your opinion. I do want to clarify that if, let's say, a white German living in Ghana were broadly discriminated against or mocked for wearing lederhosen (I won't pretend to be able to think of an up-to-date cultural tradition specifically associated with white people, please bear with), then it would be hurtful for their Ghanaian neighbors to start "discovering" lederhosen-inspired fashions while denying the impacts of the ill treatment endured by these oppressed German transplants. It's not about race or hairstyles, but mistreatment at the hands of people who (usually) don't recognize the power or perceived power inherent to their social position.
I will give some more thought to your comment about white people from African countries. My initial reaction is that cornrows may or may not be part of their own culture, and they may not be living in a context where white people have the social power to harm or harass other Africans on a racial basis. If we're talking about South Africa, of course, that's not the case, so it still seems like it comes down to who's in control. But I will reflect on it. Thanks.