No.
Getting enough monsters and idiots vote for them is still a bad thing, but that doesn't mean they won.
"Winning the elections" isn't being the single force that got the most votes individually.
That's first-past-the-post bullshit like they have in the US.
Those who win an election in a parliamentary government are those who can form a government.
There is such a thing as a power bottom.
"No! My dystopias!"
They'll always have Gilead.
Krasnov still at it with the dismantling.
When he's done the 'axis of evil' countries will have a field day with their neighboring countries completely unchecked.
Nah, there's no room for that, it would always bend and slip downward to the middle of the thigh or upward to the belly button.
Jeanis is correct.
You are not supposed to wash jeans in a way that would make them shrink.
You are not supposed to wash them in a washing machine at all in the first place.
I never wear jackets, but still get those bumps in my jeans somehow.
It makes me wonder, are Star Trek actors generally better persons due to the influence of the show's scripts, or were they picked by the cast direction that was good at picking good people?
You got it all wrong, it wasn't "rule" as in "management" it was "rule" as in "radical, rad, excellent, *guitar riff*".
Their aim is obviouly to replace the whole "low/middle/high/immortal" class system with going back to "Poor serf class, wealthy vassal class, and owner lords".
You win the public vote when you get 51% of all the people who had the right to vote. That includes those who didn't vote.
If participation is only 50% of the voters, and you get 51% of that participation, you didn't get 51% of the votes, you got 25.5% of the votes.
And by this, I don't mean what the current laws consider "winning the public vote" in any particular country. I mean what they need to be for that to be really true.