I don't hade to look to other countries, Swedens track record for enacting this kind of legislation is quite bad. But the process is still transparent and even if new legislation pass it won't come into effect immediately. So taking actions at this stage is premature imo.
Krukenberg
joined 6 months ago
The government is preparing legislation, Parliament has yet to decide on it.
Cause flight crew are seated next to emergency exits for a reason. Safety > inconvenience
That depends on the aircaft. It's very accessible on the ART42/72.
There is no precedent, 'all the means' could also be French nuclear weapons.
I would hope teslas to have cameras in more than one direction, but maybe that was a too generous assumption.
Reason 1: humans can blink – a dirty camera can not.
far right
Unconfirmed
lone wolf
Confirmed
It's a medical product used to test for type 2 diabetes (oral glucose tolerance test/OGTT)
PSA sucks, it has both low sensitivity and low specificity.
Omfg, don't get a PET-scan 'just because'. You would literally have to be injected with radioactive particles. The other stuff, while not necessary, will atleast not kill you faster.
Last paragraph is also massively oversimplified. Getting a 'you have cancer'-speech and treatment for a superslow growing prostatecancer will fuck with your mind and body more than the cancer itself. That's why most health care systems advise against general PSA screening.
view more: next ›
Flight crew are seated next to emergency exits during landing, they would occupy all crew seats except for any in a crew rest area (which is reached by ladder).
It's a dead body, it won't harass you. They might get rigor mortis but decomposition won't have time to start. Passengers comfort is last priority while balancing a metal tube going 900 km/h though the stratosphere. Some compensation can be arranged when back on the ground.