this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2023
1319 points (91.6% liked)

Memes

48193 readers
1607 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Typically this is something I hear more commonly within businesses.

Unsurprisingly the business thinks business is the most efficient way to run anything.

[–] fiddlestix 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

If private companies were more efficient than the public sector then you'd want to privatize the armed forces. The fact that no serious person argues for this tells you all you need to know.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I mean, I'm not arguing for private companies, but our government is quite spectacularly inefficient at anything except generating prime ministers! Mind you, they may be trying to be worse than the private sector so they cna claim the private sector is more efficient than the government, I guess...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Private companies are master at screwing customers for profit. Lefts not try to be private companies.

[–] Sorgan71 3 points 1 year ago

It sort of depends on what the company is doing.

[–] Borkingheck 3 points 1 year ago

I work for my local government and everybody means well but are hampered by a lack of funding. I complete a statutory required role, that is one of the two key performance indicators and it needs 2 people full time and I'm the only person on it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I think a good example of the tradeoffs between government and private companies would be lunar landing programs. If you throw cold war nuclear money at the problem, you can do things fast and ambitiously like Apollo. But nowadays for Artemis, the urgency is a lot less, so there's all sorts of games with Congress (putting things all over the place that don't make sense, lunar gateway etc) to make sure they keep funding. That results in a much more expensive much less capable rocket (SLS) than something like starship that has a whole lot less political constraints like starship. NASA can and has gotten things done well, but the funding and incentive structure makes it harder.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›