Self Hosted - Self-hosting your services.

11598 readers

65 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules

No harassment
crossposts from c/Open Source & c/docker & related may be allowed, depending on context
Video Promoting is allowed if is within the topic.
No spamming.
Stay friendly.
Follow the lemmy.ml instance rules.
Tag your post. (Read under)

Important

Beginning of January 1st 2024 this rule WILL be enforced. Posts that are not tagged will be warned and if not fixed within 24h then removed!

Lemmy doesn't have tags yet, so mark it with [Question], [Help], [Project], [Other], [Promoting] or other you may think is appropriate.

Cross-posting

[email protected] is allowed!
[email protected] is allowed!
[email protected] is allowed!
[email protected] is allowed if topic has to do with selfhosting.
[email protected] is allowed!

If you see a rule-breaker please DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

For those using docker compose, how do you manage your stacks? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I've been using Portainer to manage my homelab stacks from a single dashboard, which is more convenient than the CLI, but I'm not very satisfied with it so I've been looking for alternatives.

Portainer often fails to deploy them and is either silent about it, or doesn't give me much information to work with. The main convenience is that (when it works) it automatically pulls the updated docker compose files from my repo and deploys it without any action on my part.

Docker Swarm and Kubernetes seem to be the next ones in line. I have some experience with K8s so I know it can be complex, but I hope it's a complexity most paid upfront when setting everything up rather than being complicated to maintain.

Do you have any experience with either one of these, or perhaps another way to orchestrate these services?

all 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

Docker Compose as is.

I used Portainer for like 2 years when I first learned Docker (I only used to deploy compose file and motoring the container), but it's really shit when you know how it works.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

I use Portainer, never had any issues with it and I'm running around 40 Stacks at any given time. There's also Yacht, which is nice, but not quite as feature rich as Portainer but it's super easy to use in comparison.

[–] tiwenty 1 points 2 years ago

Currently it's in the CLI, I just split my compose files in different concerns, and just use a bash alias that uses a wildcard to call them all.

But now as I'm adding a RPi in the stack to add some monitoring and a few light stuff, I'm also thinking of going to Kube. But as you say, it may be tough ^^

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Ive used both Portainer or yacht. Its a decent ways.to manage docker stacks/aps.it kinda depends on the wishes you have app wise. Im also trying out a project named cosmos.(simplyfied portainer like app but with a focus on ease of use) on afriend server