this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Football / Soccer / Calcio / Futebol / Fußball

143 readers
1 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This post was tagged by the OP as a "long read" link. Please avoid low-effort jokes and read the material before commenting. You'll be able to reply to the post after 5 minutes.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It's a lot more okay because it indicates his intentions are more likely to boost his local team of which he was presumable a lifelong fan.

It's a far cry from Abramovich using Chelsea to shore up his political and personal security, or the UAE using Man City as a sportswashing vessel to for PR gain for their theocratic police state.

I'm not pissed about teams with rich backers spending more money. I'm pissed about what interests are being furthered by football clubs being used as cynical political tools.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Can we convince Boehly to sign the Glazers?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I remember a certain fascist who was the owner of an Italian team in the 90s when they had huge success.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The thing is the drop in talent and quality is significant. People want to watch the best players and teams playing at an elite level

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I just want to see fun competition. Eredivisie is high enough a level for me.

I do recognize I'm in the minority, though.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

In the case of Chelsea, both ways of understanding the statement are correct.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Until they disappear because of shitty owners

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, that's the point, it's intentionally hypocritical. I wasn't just taking a shit on Chelsea.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Didn't need to. Sports washing worked perfectly. Cleaned through billions of money in Chelsea. Along with that probably opened up many legit business opportunities. Cherry on the cake has thousands of people now like him.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

And may all the bankrolled teams at the moment end up like Blackburn.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Brits invent football and have been whining about it ever since.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This is the definitive slogan of /r/soccer

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You're not allowed to mention that, Milan fans will get pissy and defensive

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I love how local and lower level football really does answer nearly all of everyone's concerns but they'd rather pretend the Prem was the only football league on Earth and they're forced to put up with it. Absolutely self-inflicted.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Personally I think Man City, PSG, Newcastle and RB Leipzig/Salzburg are better examples but Chelsea are definitely up there

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

He was an ex kgb agent surely they would have known he wasn't a good person yet.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

As a Chelsea fan, it’s been depressing watching other Chelsea fans justifying what we have been doing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

There was massive public backlash when Roman took over.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I’m just amazed how they always pick the perfect Boehly photo for any topic.

load more comments
view more: next ›