this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
48 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

3582 readers
121 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @[email protected] who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @[email protected] and @[email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Federal Labor has binned hundreds of millions of Kyoto “carryover” carbon credits, permanently removing the option for them to be used in to shrink Australia’s emissions reduction task and shirk its climate responsibilities.

Federal energy and climate minister Cris Bowen announced the move on Friday, day two of the 10th Australasian Emissions Reduction Summit in Sydney, and confirmed it in person at the event.

“My colleague, assistant minister Jenny McAllister, has signed the instruction which cancels them, they’re gone,” he told the summit on Friday morning.

Australia’s surplus Kyoto credits, which had amassed to more than 700 million, have for years been a blight on Australia’s climate efforts, even when those efforts themselves amounted to the better part of nothing at all.

In 2019, the Morrison Coalition government had sought to use the credits, created under the Kyoto Protocol through soft targets and convenient accounting loopholes, to further minimise its already paltry climate mitigation efforts.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Ah, good news! I'd forgotten about that Liberal-National fudging, until the National's party member on QandA this week referred to them in defence of their terrible inaction.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is a bit unfortunate:

“We certainly won’t be introducing anything like an economy wide carbon price,” he said.

“Australia is the only country that’s done it and then repealed it in the world …So you’re reigniting the climate wars if you do that, I think – and the times have changed.

“The price signals about renewable energy are a lot different in 2023 than they were in 2009. So that’s why we’ve gone down the sectoral approach.”

Although their reasoning is understandable given the unhinged response from the media we could expect and because renewables are so competitive at this point. A shame though, given it's a very effective way to reduce emissions, as the period before the repeal of the price by the Abbott-led Coalition government demonstrated.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even aside from the temptation to use offsets to kick the can down the road for reduction targets, the rampant abuse of carbon credits make this absolutely the right decision.

Relevant viewing: Wendover Productions: The Carbon Offset Problem

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

The abuse isn't the only issue either, it seems like some of the carbon credit organisations aren't fulfilling their claims either https://youtu.be/Vw3jw5IYL2c?si=R75QkDgFQV_S6o06