this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2023
19 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

4060 readers
276 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] byroon 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is overly dense and could do with editing but is pretty interesting imo. Here's my attempt at summary:

  • NATS gets the flightplan in ICAO format
  • they need to extract just the UK part of that flight plan
  • they convert the ICAO flight-plan to ADEXP format, which contains additional waypoints
  • they find the UK section of the ADEXP
  • they now need to convert back to ICAO
  • they try to match the start and end of the UK ADEXP to ICAO
  • duplicate waypoint names exist! The end of the ADEXP route gets wrongly matched with the start of the ICAO route (cos they have the same name)
  • the software recognises this doesn't make sense, but instead of rejecting this flight plan shuts the entire system down
  • the backup system comes online, and reprocesses the same data, hits the same bug, and shuts down as well
[โ€“] byroon 2 points 1 year ago

Basically it sounds like an utter fucking shit show for something so safety critical, and the report from NATS unsurprisingly but disappointingly tries to spin it as positively as possible