this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
88 points (94.9% liked)

World News

32282 readers
609 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Cool. The sooner human population starts to go down the better it will be the the rest of the planet.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well yes. But it is the same as like quitting smoking and drinking as a heavy abuser from one to the other day. Your next few weeks will be not so cool. On this case it will be not so cool decades

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Looking here the fertility rate is declining since the 1960s, so I wouldn't say 60 years is like quitting from one day to another, they had more than enough time to tackle the problem.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Oh yes yes. Of course the time would be enough to apply policies to tackle the problems created by this. However my experience of humanity so far is that those time will not be properly used to tackle the problems 🙃 therefore it will still feel like a cold turkey (IMHO)

[–] Jackcooper 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I truly didn't know SK was worse than Japan

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

IIRC: The rate in Japan has been below replacement level (2.1) for longer but the rate in SK has been falling faster and has now passed Japan.

Edit:
Just did some quick research:

First year below 2.1

Japan: 1975

Sth Korea: 1984

Year Sth Korea dropped below Japan's rate and kept falling: 2001.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Will be interesting to see how the countries with a decline manage (japan, Russia, Korea come to mind)

[–] x4740N 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

North or South Korea

Edit: article says south korea

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've noticed a major uptick in people referring to South Korea as just Korea.

I think the powers that be are just trying to wipe the idea of a North Korea out of people's minds. It's just Korea, and South Korea is the owner of it all. (in their minds and how they want us to believe)

[–] notacuban 2 points 1 year ago

Eh, it's more likely that the statistics that come out of North Korea are so few and so unreliable that there's no reason to specify that they're talking about South Korea, it's just assumed by most that they aren't talking about the Hermit Kingdom.

And fwiw the South Koreans refer to their own country as 대한민국 daehanmiguk - the Great Korean People's Country and the North call themselves 조선 Joseon (or more specifically the Democratic People's Republic of Joseon), the name of the last Korean dynasty. Neither refer to each other as "North" or "South" and they discourage the use of divided names because it implies the goal of both isn't unification.