Surprised it took that long to exist here. Awesome!
this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2023
44 points (97.8% liked)
Wow this Lemmy Exists!
2693 readers
1 users here now
An aid to new Community discovery. Find an interesting new Lemmy/Kbin etc. community? Post about it here for fame and fortune (fame and fortune not guaranteed)
Community/instance Requests - see [email protected] where there is a curated list of related resources in this stickiedpost here: https://lemmy.ca/post/612532
Moderation Strictness - 2023-06-16 For now since the Threadiverse is taking off, we will allow, for the time being, more general questions about Lemmy (and KBin) usage, particularly around community/magazine discovery and sharing. Starting next week however we're going to ask you to move such posts to more appropriate forums such as [email protected] , or [email protected]
Rules
- Don't be a jerk or be deliberately unhelpful
- Post title should include the community name as one would type it into the community search, with instance name preferred.
- post content should elaborate more specifically what/for whom the community is about
- Please no NSFW communities -if you want to create /c/wowthisNSFW exists go right ahead.
- No posting of personal information
- No joke, troll, or deliberately misleading requests, suggestions or posts
- no SPAM
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I fail to see how this is better than anti-work.
I checked out of antiwork about the time of their TV/PR fiasco. I know the original intent of the sub was to be opposed to all work (I am oversimplifying), but it was coopted by a larger "lets make work better by calling out bad actors and bad behaviors" movement, which is what attracted me to it. Then the original mods kinda shot the movement in the foot and I stopped checking in.
Is the new /c/antiwork a return to their roots of "all work BAD, down with all work" or the larger "lets make work better" ethos?
the name "anti-work" used to be a movement against work entirely (i.e. the abolishment of all labor altogether). I don't think that's a viable societal system. There is no known system in human history where majority of the population can gain economic rewards from not doing anything in return.
Work reform doesn't aim to abolish labor, but it aims to increase the share of rewards reaped by the workers (as opposed to capitalists - be it shareholders or owners).