this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
161 points (100.0% liked)

World News

41909 readers
4270 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Four former British ambassadors to the United States have expressed concern about the future of intelligence sharing with the US following the re-election of Donald Trump.

Sir David Manning, who served as ambassador between 2003 and 2007, told a parliamentary committee some of Trump's appointees had "strange track records" which would create a "problem on the intelligence front".

Dame Karen Pierce, who only left the role last month, said intelligence sharing would continue "even if at the top level there might be things we might wish to be circumspect about".

. . .

He said some of the people appointed by Trump to lead intelligence and security could "present some difficulties in terms of their view of us and views of co-operation".

MBFC
Archive

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MrNesser 9 points 6 hours ago

Very cagey way of saying some of those people may be suspect in their loyalties and probably are russian agents

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 hours ago

Good riddance. The 5 Eyes program need to be dismantled. circumventing civil rights by having your "friends" spy on your own ciitzens for you has been a despicable endeavor all along. And it should have been obvious to the involved politicians, that this kind of "honor amongst thieves" would only last as long.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Some people may need a British <-> English translator for all that.

In British, that’s some pretty scathing language.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 hours ago

“strange track records”

They're obvious Russian assets...

“problem on the intelligence front”

...who will pass on the names of all our spies and assignments to Putin...

Intelligence sharing would continue “even if at the top level there might be things we might wish to be circumspect about”.

...so we're going to bullshit them and not tell them the important stuff.