this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2025
144 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

1329 readers
296 users here now

Protect your privacy in the digital world

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be nice, civil and no bigotry/prejudice.
  2. No tankies/alt-right fascists. The former can be tolerated but the latter are banned.
  3. Stay on topic.
  4. Don't promote big-tech software.
  5. No reposting of news that was already posted. Even from different sources.
  6. No crypto, blockchain, etc.
  7. No Xitter links. (only allowed when can't fact check any other way, use xcancel)

Related communities:

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/56769139

cross-posted from: https://sopuli.xyz/post/23170564

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Chat control, Sweden with Signal, now this BS. What the hell EU? Nobody believes that this crap is to protect children or now to "catch narcos". I really wonder what is this about. In the spanish Constitution we have an article that is supposed to protect us from this, and still they were one of the countries pushing the chat control to happen.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

This is why I don't trust anyone who says to use EU software over American software. Hey stupid, it's all run by capital, and they all wanna stick their nose into your private life.

[–] AkashicOwl 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ok so I'm going to get hated for that, but trust me, this is just me being naive and knowing nothing about many subjects. But so, as much as this law can get into excesses and seems really bad, and I clearly don't want it, is it possible to balance the debate and say, objectively, that this can actually be help to help stop narcos which are getting a bit out of hand? Again, I'm leaning left, but I like to see both sides, I think nobody is ever 100% wrong, so I'm wondering what people think about it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What I think is that it won't matter to them because narcos and other predators will just change the methods they use to communicate, and for the rest we will be left with this backdoor that could go wrong in so many ways and the mass of people can't change that easily their methods of communication.

[–] jimmy90 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

that is a strategy; to force organised crime onto other networks and off the all too effective public encrypted networks

to make them easier to identify and track

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

and could be in conflict with European data protection legislation

If that really is the case someone will take it to the ECJ.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

CryptPad.fr should be on watch.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

And Qwant search