this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
4 points (75.0% liked)

PCGaming

0 readers
2 users here now

Gaming, on PC

Rules

Rules:

Treat everyone with respect. All people are created equal and should be treated as such. It is natural that people have different opinions, however, please stick to basic discussion etiquette; disagreement is fine, insulting or harassing others is not.

All submissions should be primarily relevant to the Mag. Posts that primarily reference other topics will be moderated on a case-by-case basis. Comments are not subject to this rule.

Prohibited Content: Exposed or Accentuated Genitalia (including if covered by clothing), Excessively Exposed Breasts, Express or Strongly Implied Sexual Activity, Posing or Context (Including text), Cropped/Censored versions of any of the above content or any other pornographic material.

Do not include spoilers in the title. Submissions that involve spoilers (storylines etc.) should be marked as such. This includes comments, please use proper precautions when mentioning spoiler material.

Low quality/effort posts are subject to removal. The quality of a post is primarily judged by how much it contributes to a constructive discussion. Posts with repetitive content or certain generic topics may be removed to help maintain mag quality; Others determined on a case-by-case basis.

Self-promotion is not prohibited but may subject to removal.

founded 2 years ago
 

Me and the DM, the eldest members of our TTRPG group playing Lancer absolutely roasted the youngest member in the firmest way possible for passing us a written document on his character, which I immediately thought looked like LLM slop, when he wanted us to read his dossier after our session last week.

In good faith, I read it, asked whether he wrote it, and he answered he used ChatGPT.

I immediately responded: "If you can't be bothered to write it, I can't be bothered to read it."

That also explains why his character interaction was a little disjointed, and callous. By being excused from thinking deeply about the character he was embodying in our session, he kept making some of the most inflammatory choices possible until the characters of the rest of our players and the DM tried to nudge him towards not being so destructive or greedy.

If this were a video game, it would be the equivalent of not reading the storyline, and just jumping straight into combat every single time, then conversing with others who read the story and had the myriad emotional investments and wondering why we are all feeling things.

Now, you can do this in real life, via LLM-assisted TTRPG character generation. I think he is missing the point of why in the age of computer games with the convenience of all the rules and tool-tips, people still want to gather together and be humans about the stories we want to tell. #Gaming #LLM #TTRPG #Lancer

#PCGaming

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago

Now, I don't know Lancer at all.

But I always was a little ambivalent on my character backstories in DnD. All the DMs I ever played with had a pretty firm 'fuck your backstory' mindset if it involved anything other than fluff for your alignment and class choice. It was the same as supplying a drawing of your character: fun but not relevant to the campaign being run.

Using an LLM even in that context feels like a huge eyeroll.

For a TTRPG that might be more in depth on that stuff than DnD that would seem disrespectful to everyone.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago

@rewarp I've been using Gemini as a GM to help me create templates for documents I want to feel real, or summarize our games based on transcripts (Mission 1 in the bag, people looking at mechs for their first LL) But having it just write a whole backstory is crazy.