this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2024
7 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

837 readers
471 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Alphane_Moon 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Can't speak for the legal nuances inherent to the case, it may well be that Qualcomm/Nuvia's contracts with ARM allowed for such actions, but from a layman's perspective it does seem that Qualcomm wanted to undercut payments to ARM.

Although the discrepancy between the $1.4 billion internal Qualcomm figure and ARM's internal $50 M impact estimate is rather strange.