this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
70 points (97.3% liked)

Legal News

272 readers
152 users here now

International and local legal news.


Basic rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Sensitive topics need NSFW flagSome cases involve sensitive topics. Use common sense and if you think that the content might trigger someone, post it under NSFW flag.
3. Instance rules applyAll lemmy.zip instance rules listed in the sidebar will be enforced.


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 36 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

The whole argument from the judge is baffling since he literally gave the full discretion to the trustee in his initial order to determine the process of the auction, and now the judge says that the same discretion was invalid.

If I were a betting person, I would say that politics of it all got involved in this case.

[–] Arbiter 19 points 6 days ago

Of course it did. The assets were supposed to be sold to a rich rightwinger.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago

“It seemed doomed almost from the moment they decided to go to a sealed bid,” Judge Lopez said. “Nobody knows what anybody else is bidding,” he added.

The absolute best possible interpretation is that he's incompetent, because sealed bids are an entirely legitimate approach to maximizing return on a sale.

[–] trolololol 7 points 6 days ago

Just set up a shell company like any rich MF