this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2024
691 points (91.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

9742 readers
193 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"It's not like the government is forcing you to buy a car!"

If you live in a city with parking minimums, yes they fucking are.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Urban fabric is when everything’s a building, meaning you can’t go anywhere unless they’ve got the door open for you.

[–] FireRetardant 3 points 2 days ago

Are you proposing a society where we never leave our cars and every business is a drive thru? Even if you drive to a wal mart today, they still have to have the door open for you to shop there.

And our current urban fabric is everything is a road, you can't go anywhere unless you drive a car. Can't afford a car? Too young to drive? Have a health condition that prevents you from driving? Want to choose a car free life? Too bad.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Voyajer 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Those lots are horribly inefficient, aisle-less parking would make more sense for businesses of that size

[–] FireRetardant 4 points 2 days ago

They may be horribly ineffecient but that seems to be the standard design. Plus compared to pretty much any other land use, even the most optimized surface level parking lot is an ineffecient use of land.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (3 children)

You're not wrong in the long term. But in the short term, people will park anywhere possible close to the shop, blocking everywhere near with cars.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago

Parking tickets

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Xanis 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In this thread: A lot of misconceptions and more than a few poorly thought out comments.

Also in this thread: Identifying the need to restructure the current standard before car usage can be realistically reduced by large amounts.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›