this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2024
9 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

1320 readers
357 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Some 78,000 people had their phone or bag snatched last year, more than double the previous year.

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Maybe a bit cynical, but this sounds like an attempt at making it possible to remotely backdoor or at least disable the phones of people the government doesnt like. You can already track any phones location as soon as it is powered on. They should just get the phones back to the owner instead of bricking them.

[–] haywire7 5 points 2 months ago

I guess the thinking is making them next to worthless means they'll get stolen less.

Most networks will bar a stolen pones IMEI if it's reported but that doesn't stop them so this would have to be a step up.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Sucks for them, but this is the wrong way. Except if I can work my own exclusive system, or a system from another service provider into this. Previous to the stealing, of course. And without anyone needing to "allow" me