this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2023
19 points (100.0% liked)

ChatGPT

1504 readers
4 users here now

A community to discuss about ChatGPT and AI. Not affiliated with OpenAI.

Rules:

  1. NSFW must be marked as such

  2. No porn

  3. Don't be toxic

  4. jailbreaks are allowed for now at least

  5. No trashposts.

  6. Keep the memes to a minimum

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mac 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because Meta will harvest and profit of the data.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

If we're talking about something like LLaMA (i.e. people can run the model locally) then it's impossible to do that directly. A model can't collect data, metrics, phone home, anything like that by itself. The article sounds like it's talking about that kind of thing, not providing a service that people can access a model through (in the lines of ChatGPT).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

we need competition!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Is that the similar thing as llama they published before?

Edit: typo

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

LLaMA is only free for personal use. Also the actual model got leaked a week after the paper.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

IIRC it was only supposed to be for research purposes. Individuals wouldn't have been eligible.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This was the initial strategy of OpenAI and the reason for which it was created: put pressure on Facebook and Google. It worked in its own pervese way, I would say.