this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2023
1679 points (96.6% liked)

Memes

45966 readers
1748 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zapafaz 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sorta not really related but Freya's video on splines ("The Continuity of Splines") is a virtually perfect resource if you're interested in learning about... well... splines.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

wow I wish we learned this kind of stuff in school

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

I think gamedev or I guess graphics programming, visualize maths pretty well. I literally quit high school because I could never make any progress in several areas, including math class. But once I read/watch more about gamedev, programming, graphics programming on my own, I got to understand many mathematical terminologies better than I have ever been taught in any school.

[–] UserNotFound 7 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I don't know her, so maybe my question is stupid, but does she explain math without using code? I, honestly, am too stupid to programing, I don't understand it. I understand summary, not the second one

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

She has a youtube channel

I've only watched a couple of her videos--on Splines and Bezier curves--and her explanations and animations were intuitive and beautiful to watch, but ultimately her target audience is game devs... So the answer to your question is "technically yes*"

*it's with the intent of learning to code the math

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Invented in the 50s, Fortran = FORmula Translating language. It was basically created to solve this sort of problem.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (6 children)

The biggest difference (other than the existence of infinity) is that the upper limit is inclusive in summation notation and exclusive in for loops. Threw me for a loop (hah) for a while.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

i still don't understand but thanks

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Wouldn't reducer be more precise?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I think this is pretty much the imperative equivalent of foldl (\acc i -> acc + 3*i) 0 [1..4].

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] spacesweedkid27 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok now try infinite for loops

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

freya is not a random internet people

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh cool, I know who this person is, she did a couple of amazing videos on Bezier curves and splines

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/aVwxzDHniEw

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›