this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2024
22 points (100.0% liked)

Austin Texas Community

990 readers
10 users here now

Austin Community news, resources, chat, and memes Currently there are not smaller communities like classifieds or jobs like there was on Reddit, feel free to create any related communities and send me a message, I can link them here in the sidebar. For now, let’s feel free to post any content, as long as it’s related to Austin or Texas in general.

Rules

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam or gofundme type requests.
  3. No racist or other prejudices allowed.
    If you see these please report them.

Currently we only have two mods, if you see something, please report the post using the three dots menu.

If you would like to help moderate, please contact me: https://lemmy.world/u/netburnr or on Matrix https://matrix.to/#/@netburnr:matrix.org

Related Communities

[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

Austin Discord - run by hopexx

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A Travis County resident is seeking to remove progressive District Attorney José Garza from office using a 2023 Texas law aimed at limiting the discretion of locally elected prosecutors. A state district judge in Comal County on Friday appointed an attorney to represent Texas and pursue the case.

House Bill 17 took effect last September and allows courts to remove district attorneys for “official misconduct.” That could include refusing to prosecute certain criminal offenses under state law, such as low-level marijuana possession.

When Gov. Greg Abbott signed the bill, the Republican leader said the goal of the law was to “hold rogue district attorneys accountable.” The GOP priority legislation gained steam after progressive DAs, including Garza, said they would not prosecute people seeking abortions banned under Texas law.

However, elected district attorneys have significant prosecutorial discretion, meaning they get to decide which cases to pursue. As KUT previously reported, the law undermines this longtime convention.

Travis County resident Mary Dupuis filed a petition to remove Garza from office on April 8. The filing came just over a month after Garza won the March Democratic primary for district attorney in a landslide.

Dupuis’ petition argues Garza must be removed from office “due to incompetency and official misconduct.”

 

The petition alleges that misconduct includes “indiscriminately” pressing charges against law enforcement officials and presenting those cases to grand juries. The filing also argues Garza has refused to prosecute certain crimes, citing statements he has made on not pursuing abortion-related cases.

The petition concludes that “because (Garza’s) conduct makes him unqualified to serve as district attorney, he should be removed from office.”

This is not the first challenge Garza has faced under HB 17. Jason Salazar filed a petition to remove the DA from office last December. At the time, Garza’s office was prosecuting Salazar for a felony drug charge. The criminal charge Salazar was facing disqualified him from seeking to remove the DA under the law.

X Post

Dupuis’ petition is moving forward. In his order Friday, Judge Dib Waldrip, with the 433rd District Court in Comal County, stated Bell County Attorney Jim Nichols – who, like Waldrip, is a Republican – will litigate the case.

“The prosecuting attorney representing the state shall possess full authority under the law to proceed in the litigation as he and his office deem appropriate to bring this matter to a prompt and proper legal resolution,” Waldrip wrote in the order.

 

Waldrip also ordered Garza to appear in a Travis County district courtroom on May 16.

Garza responded to the petition in a statement emailed to KUT on Saturday afternoon, saying that his office works every day to “bring justice to Travis County and keep people safe.”

Garza also said in the statement that this attempt to remove him from office is politically motivated and he expects it to fail.

all 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] logicbomb 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I don't know too much about Garza, but the language used in the petition sounds biased.

“indiscriminately” pressing charges against law enforcement officials and presenting those cases to grand juries

"Indiscriminately"? Surely there must be some evidence. "Indiscriminately" would mean he targets completely innocent people and brings them to the grand jury with zero evidence. Or, less likely, it could mean that all law enforcement officials are criminals, and he's randomly choosing which criminals to press charges against.

The filing also argues Garza has refused to prosecute certain crimes, citing statements he has made on not pursuing abortion-related cases.

This is what the voters want and it's an elected position. If Garza is removed, the voters will eventually vote for another DA who will do the same thing, or at least achieve the same result.

Again, I don't know too much about Garza, but just from this article, it seems like he's being targeted for doing what his constituents want.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yep, and that’s how the Texas GOP rolls. They also made it illegal for cities to cut police budgets, they made it illegal for cities to put requirements on rideshare companies for their drivers, they made it illegal to ban disposable plastic bags. The Texas GOP is a big fan of small locally-oriented government until that small locally-oriented government does stuff GOP donors don’t like.