this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2023
40 points (90.0% liked)

Lemmy NSFW

11717 readers
41 users here now

Updates about lemmynsfw.com

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Both host content that are against our content policy and have had issues with users from those sites entering our community crossposting content that violates our content policy. We are discussing defederating other instances as well. There is discussion of lemmit.online being defederated because it pretty much exclusively scrapes reddit content and reposts it, and some content creators have expressed discomfort. If there's other instances that might be worth considering defederating from, just post and it'll be added to the current discussion.

and before anyone brings it up, lemmygrad defederated with us.

This isn't a dictatorship but I ask that you please behave in the comment section and at least try to understand why we are defederating.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I think defederating instances that post illegal content makes sense, as the admins are responsible for the content on their server.

I think defederating instances that host belligerent users and content makes sense, because it protects those that are targeted by them.

I don't think defederating instances that post content some people don't want to see makes sense, a la Lemmit. If the admins want to go that far, you might as well close off the entire fediverse and only host content at your personal approval. Dunno why you'd need a Lemmy instance for that.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

It's not just content though, essentially it's bots.

The problem with bots isn't just spam, a social network is defined by the interaction among the community...I think that's a fair call.

I might be up for having unscripted LLMs on the network, but repost bots are like a weird smell... It's not that big a deal individually, but it'll make the community noticably worse

load more comments (3 replies)