this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2024
471 points (97.6% liked)

Open Source

31359 readers
88 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 23 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (25 children)

When it launched the apps were more modern than bitwarden. If bitwarden hasn't improved since, then it's still the same

[–] asbestos 15 points 7 months ago (24 children)

Bitwarden’s interface hasn’t changed a bit and it’s a pity

[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago (3 children)

There is nothing wrong with it. Why people always want things to be changing? What really important feature are you missing?

[–] VelociCatTurd 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] hackitfast 2 points 7 months ago

Looks like everything is essentially in the same spot UI wise, but with a native application that hopefully gets moving a lot faster.

I've noticed that currently on Bitwarden, for auto fill it takes 6-7 seconds just to get authenticated with fingerprint and fill in the username and password field. That should hopefully be down to like 2 or 3 seconds.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)