this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
52 points (100.0% liked)

Football (Soccer fútbol fußball 足球 )

5682 readers
60 users here now

Here for discussion of all things association football/soccer!

Rules

Other Football/Soccer Related Communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] slouchy 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Baby steps in the right direction. We need more openness in referee decisions and a more collaborative approach among the on-field ref team for VAR decisions.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Definitely steps in the right direction, really not sure why it wasn't implemented like that from the beginning. One of the few things they get right in the NFL.

[–] slouchy 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, Rugby's had a much better approach with TMO (it'a version of VAR) - basically if you're watching on TV the director can switch the audio (and often does) to the ref conversation with the TMO and rest of the ref team.

I remember watching NFL a couple of times and thing the ref explanations were fantastic.

In football, referees generally have some kind of rationale for their decisions. Sometimes they are simply wrong (see the bad offside call in Juventus - Salernitana), but generally, explaining it and getting consensus with the rest of the ref team will carry the fans along with the refs' logic. And if they're regularly wrong, the exposure will make them either up their game, or change rules to make their application more realistic.

[–] ThatsDrSpaceJunk2U 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Baby steps for sure. It's taken way too long to get to this, but at least they are making progresss.

[–] slouchy 2 points 1 year ago

Absolutely. It looks like they're talking about selected dialogue so far, which only adds another layer of mistrust if there's a controversial incident and they don't release the audio.

But at least, it's a move in the right direction.