this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2024
48 points (90.0% liked)

Cars - For Car Enthusiasts

4004 readers
33 users here now

About Community

c/Cars is the largest automotive enthusiast community on Lemmy and the fediverse. We're your central hub for vehicle-related discussion, industry news, reviews, projects, DIY guides, advice, stories, and more.


Rules





founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KpntAutismus 12 points 1 year ago (13 children)

V8s have a great sound, but americans have historically been very bad at getting any kind of fuel mileage out of them.

downsizing would be an idea, you could technically make a 2-3 Liter V8, but then you have the complexity of two equally performing 4-cilynder engines.

and especially ford doesn't do mechanical complexity very well, look at the 1.0 ecoboost.

[–] Trollception 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The 6.2L LT1 in the Camaro SS I owned got about 16-18 mpg city and 27-30mpg highway. Its actually comparable to the 2.5T SUV I drive now with the city mileage being a bit better in the SUV and the highway mileage worse than the Camaro.

[–] KpntAutismus 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

30mpg is actually impressive for 6 litres of displacement, well done chevy! but i imagine that was the stick shift one.

[–] Trollception 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

It was an automatic. It had active fuel management which included cylinder deactivation. When it was cruising on the highway it was running in V4 mode. That and it was a coupe and far more aerodynamic than most SUVs.

[–] KpntAutismus 1 points 11 months ago

so it basically ran as a 3 litre 4 cylinder, but still. my mom gets 25-30mpg out of her 1.8L automatic avensis, so that camaro is up there with "decent" fuel mileage.

load more comments (9 replies)